search for: forewarning

This is by no means official yet, but I put together a proof-of-concept svn-to-git conversion of the NUT source tree: https://github.com/clepple/nut If you are interested in experimenting with the repository, feel free to clone it, but if we identify any problems with the Git import from SVN, be forewarned that I might blow away this repository and start over. In particular, I guessed at some

Hi!!!! I''ve tried ROR! it''s fantastic!!! wonderful!!! I WANT LEARN ALL ABOUT IT!!! Do you have some links ( if exists in italian language ), or suggest me some book i can buy?? thx very much -- /\/\ariano Di Felice Java PHP Python programmer with MySQL, PostgreSql, SQLite and Oracle support Linux Platform Developer mariano.difelice@gmail.com Tel. 0735 703735 Cell +39 339

On 6/22/11 5:34 AM, Andreas Wilhelm wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for a way to identify dependencies of > function-pairs (memory-dependency, control-dependency...) in order to > parallelize them. > For aliasing problems I use the DataStructureAnalysis. I'm assuming that this is the DSA analysis in the poolalloc module. Be forewarned that: 1) DSA works with LLVM

...normal (not rocket science) business (80-20 rule) can be done just as well in R in comparison with tools like SAS, Matlab, etc. Q2) I haven't tried the processing routines for much larger data-sets assuming "size" is not a constraint nowadays. I know that I should try out ... but any forewarnings would help. Is it likely that something that works for my "desktop" dataset is quite as likely to work when scaled up to a "cloud dataset"? Assuming that I do the clearing out of unused objects, not running into infinite loops, etc? i.e. is there any problem with the "fun...

Hi, I'm rotating my PGP keys, so this is a forewarning that the key used to sign the next release of portable OpenSSH will be different to the one I've used in the past. Hopefully the gnupg incantations that I recited have resulted in a new key that is correctly cross-signed by my old one so there should be a trust path across the rollover. The n...

...ures 3. File bugs and/or create reviews to remove the flag from each of the tests. There are two reasons I prefer this approach. First, new tests are "correct by default" while we clean up the existing problematic tests. Second, out of tree work has an easy path forward and reasonable forewarning. They can add the flag temporarily and fix problematic tests when time permits, rather it suddenly breaking their CI whenever open source flips the switch. > I suggest you file a bug with the complete list of test failures that > non-overlapping CHECK-DAG finds. That will help keep track of...

On 3/11/13 6:32 AM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing llvm pass for OpenCL code which does some memory checking to > verify that code does not access memory outside of the programs own > statically allocated areas. If you're looking to see if your program only accesses in-bounds memory, SAFECode and Address Sanitizer may be able to do this for you already. If

Hi Paul, On 2009-12-04, at 09:34, Paul Melis wrote: > I hope you don't mind me sending this mail directly to you (instead of to llvm-dev), but you seem to be the expert on LLVM's GC support :) If you'd rather have me send to llvm-dev, please say so. You'll reach a wider audience with the list, though I haven't been able to keep up with it lately. > I'm trying to

Hello, I'm looking for a way to identify dependencies of function-pairs (memory-dependency, control-dependency...) in order to parallelize them. For aliasing problems I use the DataStructureAnalysis. To solve simple memory- and control-dependency problems I want to use memdep. But unfortunately I even fail with following simple C++ example... int a( int n) { return n; } int b( int n) {

Kenneth Hoste wrote: > John Criswell wrote: >> Okay. As Rob has already said, it sounds like you want to write an >> LLVM pass that adds global variables and instructions to a program. >> So, to state it explicitly, you want to: >> >> 1) Compile the program that you want to instrument to LLVM bytecode >> using llvm-gcc. >> 2) Use an LLVM pass that

I''m re-reading the section on dns names in the shorewall docs: "I personally recommend strongly against using DNS names in Shorewall configuration files. If you use DNS names and you are called out of bed at 2:00AM because Shorewall won''t start as a result of DNS problems then don''t say that you were not forewarned." Having been stung by this a few times

Be forewarned, I am new to Linux. I am using Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala). I have installed wine (1.1.38) and I am able to run RollerCoaster Tycoon 3 both with and without a virtual desktop. It runs with no problems except for the fact that it does not receive keyboard commands! I have looked all over the Internet and still have yet to find a solution. Someone help, please! I haven't

...from each of the > > tests. > > > > There are two reasons I prefer this approach. First, new tests are > > "correct by default" while we clean up the existing problematic tests. > > Second, out of tree work has an easy path forward and reasonable > > forewarning. They can add the flag temporarily and fix problematic tests > > when time permits, rather it suddenly breaking their CI whenever open > > source flips the switch. > > Those are excellent points, and that approach totally makes sense. > --paulr > > Make sense. I'll w...

All, This message is placed here for the aid of others in the future. I have search the archives for this solution, but sadly, only found a couple of (rather old) messages from people exhibiting having the same problems, but without any replies for this solution. Please forgive me as I seem to ramble on here, I do so with the intent of making this solution more findable by others having this

Hi, I'm doing llvm pass for OpenCL code which does some memory checking to verify that code does not access memory outside of the programs own statically allocated areas. To make dynamic check generation easier, I would like to collect all allocas and global variable definitions and create one big memory structure (for each global, local and private) containing all the allocated memory as

...e reviews to remove the flag from each of the > tests. > > There are two reasons I prefer this approach. First, new tests are > "correct by default" while we clean up the existing problematic tests. > Second, out of tree work has an easy path forward and reasonable > forewarning. They can add the flag temporarily and fix problematic tests > when time permits, rather it suddenly breaking their CI whenever open > source flips the switch. Those are excellent points, and that approach totally makes sense. --paulr

...; > tests. >> > >> > There are two reasons I prefer this approach. First, new tests are >> > "correct by default" while we clean up the existing problematic tests. >> > Second, out of tree work has an easy path forward and reasonable >> > forewarning. They can add the flag temporarily and fix problematic tests >> > when time permits, rather it suddenly breaking their CI whenever open >> > source flips the switch. >> >> Those are excellent points, and that approach totally makes sense. >> --paulr >> >...

John Criswell wrote: > Okay. As Rob has already said, it sounds like you want to write an LLVM > pass that adds global variables and instructions to a program. So, to > state it explicitly, you want to: > > 1) Compile the program that you want to instrument to LLVM bytecode > using llvm-gcc. > 2) Use an LLVM pass that you write to instrument the program. > 3) Use

* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote: > > Who said that? Please smack them on the head with a broom. We are all > > actively working on implementing Rusty's paravirt-ops proposal. It > > makes the API vs ABI discussion moot, as it allow for both. > > So everyone is still skirting the issue, oh great :) No, we are working closely together on Rusty's paravirt ops

* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote: > > Who said that? Please smack them on the head with a broom. We are all > > actively working on implementing Rusty's paravirt-ops proposal. It > > makes the API vs ABI discussion moot, as it allow for both. > > So everyone is still skirting the issue, oh great :) No, we are working closely together on Rusty's paravirt ops