search for: foresee

I foresee problems with this on both Windows and non-Windows. A typical libc implementation has a lot of internal state that is shared across API boundaries in a way that is considered an implementation detail. So making assumptions about which state is shared and which isn't is going to be a problem....

I have been asked to assume the role of Architect for a large project here at HP and I have accepted. While this is an important step forward for my career, it is a step backward for Shorewall in as much as the time that I will be able to devote to Shorewall in the foreseeable future will be be very limited. So while I will attempt to keep on top of problems, Shorewall 2.0 will have to be put on indefinite hold and support for Shorewall 1.3 and 1.4 from me will be limited. There will be no support from me for Shorewall 1.2. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall -...

...It expects the server to return <option></option> values. If one of them has a selected="selected" attribute, it will probably be pre-selected. Not tested that though. Also only tested in FF, however the only actual new code is a line of Element.update(), so I don''t foresee any X-Browser problems. As usual, development site, can''t show the example to the world. Yet another patch that will never know what CVS is. Enjoy people. -Rob _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@p...

...em to have died down, so now it seems the right time to summarise everything and get to a concrete and robust proposal. Do we have any phab review on the document? I'm sure questions will be raised on the review, so we need to put it up some weeks before our soft deadline (end of Aug). I also foresee discussions in this review needing changes on the sub-modules proposal, so we should really start as soon as possible. cheers, --renato

...ion () while true do print "A" coroutine.yield() end end) > c2 = coroutine.create(function () while true do print "B" coroutine.yield() end end) > while true do coroutine.resume(c1) coroutine.resume(c2) end A B A B A .... I've got no plans working on this stuff in the foreseeable future, so, if you've got an idea how this might be useful,.. you know how git-clone works. ;)

Hi, One of Asterisk features is fax2mail. As a good share of incoming faxes can be considered as advertising spam, does it make sense to use email anti-spam features to filter them ? I can't foresee any practical way to do so but I would be very curious to discuss about it. Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071211/b8f268fa/attachment.htm

Jerry, Read your slides from SambaXP 2004 but do not see any mention of IPv6 support. Do you have any plans to support IPv6 in the future ? Is there no push for it in the foreseeable future ? I attempted to send this question to samba@lists.samba.org <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org> but it kept kicking back to me from System Administrator [postmaster@Savola.COM] Thanks Chuck

On 01.12.2010 09:25, John McCall wrote: > > One problem I foresee is that it's possible for a dispatch block to become unreachable from its landing pad. If that block is then deleted, we'd lose information about what's supposed to unwind there. This could happen if, e.g., someone had a noreturn destructor. In languages that usefully allow throws fr...

...a part of the code that is not used often. That said, it is possible that some of the options we have with autoconf are not available on a CMake build (I'm guessing here), and thus deprecating autoconf entirely is not an option right now. If the reason is strong enough to keep autoconf for the foreseeable future, than we do need coverage. But coverage means running both CMake and autoconf, both warm and cold, on each variant that we care about. So, if that would be true, I'd have to have at least 4 buildbot configurations for every ARM platform I care about. For now, I care about A9 and A15...

...ode reader. > Sure, but it is not uncommon to LTO with old bitcode. We all know it's pretty easy to crash LLVM with bad bitcode or bad IR. These interfaces are not thoroughly tested. I think verifying the result of the bitcode reader by default during LTO is probably the right thing for the foreseeable future. It's the only thing that has any hope of telling the user something useful when things go wrong. I'd like it if we spent a little effort understanding why it's slow before flipping it off. Maybe the verifier is running multiple times, instead of after deserialization. We sh...

...k Telecom (www.kirktelecom.com). This company has been in the business of providing DECT solutions (IP gateway, base stations, repeaters and handsets) either to be used with Cisco CallManager (SCCP protocol) or with the Innovaphone IP PBX system (H.323). Two important elements: 1. It seems they foresee a SIP version of their product in Q1 2005. 2. They are open to perform integration tests with asterisk, provided there is sufficient business potential. In order to convince them about the business potential of an asterisk integration, I would like to ask you to drop me an email stating the numbe...

greetings, i want to sync my desktop home directory to my laptop home directory. i am using KDE for desktop. a problem that i foresee is the different screens between the 2. i synced using; rsync -a -u -v -e ssh /home/geo geo at 192.168.1.5:/home/geo.new with intent of in laptop's /home; mv geo geo.org mv geo.new geo what files and directories in 'org' directory need to be copied to the 'new' direct...

OK... maybe I got a little anxious and ran out and bought a Tyan GX28 with dual Opteron (dual core) processors. (It is a nice server ;) ) I did neglect to find out that you can not manually set the IRQ's on this motherboard. I am now stuck sharing an IRQ with the ethernet controller and no foreseeable end to my dilemma. I have a Digium TE210P and zttest consistently runs at 99.97% which as you guessed, is giving rather unpleasing sound quality. My options as I see it are: 1. Buy a new server 2. Buy a sangoma A102U I am looking for practical suggestions from those of you out there who...

...gt; g <- qrng_alloc(type="sobol",dim=2) > qrng_get(g,n= N) ->xy > > plot((xy),t="p",cex=0.5) but this does not look very random: I clearly see some pattern (diagonals, etc...), and even the non-overlapping condition is not impressive. One (painful) way I can foresee is to check the distance between each symbol and the others, and move the overlapping ones in a recursive manner. Before delving into this, I wanted to check I'm not overlooking something in the rgl quasi-random sequences, or missing a more obvious way to generate such patterns. Perhaps...

...patch will allow people to experiment with TSAN on their android devices" * "don't let the perfect be the enemy of "limping along for a bit" So, in order to let *some* people *experiment* with TSAN on *Android*, we're going to consciously make TSAN *limp along* for the foreseeable future? Is that a wise price to pay for such a far fetched goal? The "proper" solution seems to be to fix TLS support, which: * "Ideally, this should be supported with the __thread keyword, but that is not yet supported, and it is a much bigger chunk of work to get it integrate...

...logic, because it's similar to what some other projects > are doing. > > I can see as much confusion from 4.0.1 -> 5.0.0 than by having a 4.1 > that used to be weird before. > > After a few releases everything will be clear anyway... I really don't > want to make the foreseeable future weird again to avoid a potential > misunderstanding for one or two releases. > > Let's just be brutally clear in all release communications and > hopefully people will understand. > > >> The alternative would be: >> >> 3.9.0 >> 3.9.1 >>...

> On 6/25/19 7:22 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: > > I foresee problems with this on both Windows and non-Windows. A > > typical libc implementation has a lot of internal state that is shared > > across API boundaries in a way that is considered an implementation > > detail. So making assumptions about which state is shared and which > &...

...gt; > fish/test-edit.sh (it is not the only one). I guess you could turn this > > test to do the same, which could be also easier to expand if there will > > be added more commands that output things different than "true". > > Yes I have seen it but exactly because I foresee nothing but "true" in > guestfish's output I want to avoid tedious beancounting when maintaining > the expected result string. Never say never... really, better make it slightly more generic, so expanding it later is no hassle. Also, comparing to the exact output expected is a...

...ng to narrow the scope of the problem: support for VIA8237x SATA was added/fixed between 2.6.18 and 2.6.19 (the latter works perfectly). If it is possible to obtain exact same kernel tarball the I''d try to compile it alone and load and see if I get the same errors with SATA. Thanks. PS I foresee some problems if I try to compile with 2.6.19 because of different drivers layout (there was a message on this list about that). -- Dimitry Golubovsky Anywhere on the Web _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource....

Can Samba4 be used for AD/DC with virtual machines? For example, I have a Ubuntu domain member and it currently does AD authentication for users. I would like to run this computer as a VM also hosting Windows 7, which I would also like the Windows 7 user(s) to AD authenticate. One problem I foresee is joining the computer to the domain. I imagine there is only one IP address. If I join the WIN7 VM, I expect I could not use the same computer name as the Ubuntu hostname. I see other issues with ports, etc. Is this doable? Has anyone done this? THX --Mark