Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "foregone".
Did you mean:
forego
2016 Jun 01
2
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
On 1 June 2016 at 19:36, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
> Despite people's reservations of a git-only repository?
Hi Aaron, not at all!
I was especially vague on my first email to make sure SVN folks would
be shoved on the side, but John had asked for a full plan *in the case
we move*, and I was just completing the picture.
Having said that, I can't take that
2005 Apr 26
10
Ctrl-c crashes R when run as sudo (PR#7819)
I tried to submit this in R, but not sure if it worked.
When running R as sudo, using ctrl-c dumps me to the command line.
Hitting exit to exit the terminal window results in R taking 100% of
resources.
I am using R-2.1.0 on Fedora Core 3.
Thanks.
Manuel
2008 May 06
2
Can you use RSpec to test initializers?
Hi there!
I''m trying to spec out some code that will set the smtp_settings in a
custom ActiveMailer object. Basically I want to check that if my
configuration object has the right smtp_server, that the ActiveMailer
object gets set up correctly. So, my spec looks like this:
it "uses smtp server if config says so" do
2018 May 21
0
ARM64, dropping ADRP instructions, and ld.lld
Thank you for providing the explanation for how ADRP works...something I
should have done myself.
With this explanation in hand, one other alternative I was looking at was
using a linkerscript to essentially rebase the code and have ADRP
instructions that would address the correct location as a result. However,
I am not a linkerscript expert, so I am not sure if such a thing is even
possible or
2011 Jul 02
2
speeding up perception
Dear R developers: R is supposed to be slow for iterative
calculations. actually, it isn't. matrix operations are fast. it is
data frame operations that are slow.
R <- 1000
C <- 1000
example <- function(m) {
cat("rows: "); cat(system.time( for (r in 1:R) m[r,20] <-
sqrt(abs(m[r,20])) + rnorm(1) ), "\n")
cat("columns: "); cat(system.time(for (c
2018 May 21
5
ARM64, dropping ADRP instructions, and ld.lld
On 21 May 2018 at 13:57, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> "ADRL produces position-independent code, because the address is calculated
> relative to PC."
>
> From this, I'd expect ADRP to simply do Xd <- PC + n*4096, where n is a 20
> bit number, just like AUIPC in RISC-V (also a 20 literal multiplied by 4096)
> or AUIPC in MIPS