search for: force_sig

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "force_sig".

2013 Nov 07
0
Xen PV ABI on FPU doesn't match with pvops kernel FPU code, reducing to a serious memory data damage
...} local_irq_disable(); <<<< Here it closes } __thread_fpu_begin(tsk); /* * Paranoid restore. send a SIGSEGV if we fail to restore the state. */ if (unlikely(restore_fpu_checking(tsk))) { drop_init_fpu(tsk); force_sig(SIGSEGV, tsk); return; } tsk->fpu_counter++; } ] This can cause serious data damage against xen pv guests (including dom0 kernel), we have encountered this issue both in stress test and production systems. Please take a look at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen...
2013 Nov 07
0
Xen PV ABI on FPU doesn't match with pvops kernel FPU code, reducing to a serious memory data damage
...} local_irq_disable(); <<<< Here it closes } __thread_fpu_begin(tsk); /* * Paranoid restore. send a SIGSEGV if we fail to restore the state. */ if (unlikely(restore_fpu_checking(tsk))) { drop_init_fpu(tsk); force_sig(SIGSEGV, tsk); return; } tsk->fpu_counter++; } ] This can cause serious data damage against xen pv guests (including dom0 kernel), we have encountered this issue both in stress test and production systems. Please take a look at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen...
2013 Nov 20
0
[PATCH -tip v3 13/23] x86/trap: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro in trap.c
...struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, char *str, return -1; } -static void __kprobes +static void do_trap(int trapnr, int signr, char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code, siginfo_t *info) { @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ do_trap(int trapnr, int signr, char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, else force_sig(signr, tsk); } +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_trap); #define DO_ERROR(trapnr, signr, str, name) \ dotraplinkage void do_##name(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) \ @@ -267,7 +268,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_double_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) } #endif -dotraplinkage void __kprob...
2013 Nov 15
23
[PATCH -tip RFC v2 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series
2013 Nov 15
23
[PATCH -tip RFC v2 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series
2013 Nov 20
28
[PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined
2013 Nov 20
28
[PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined