Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "foperator".
Did you mean:
operator
2009 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] malloc vs malloc
...6) there are other routines that we want to make assumptions about,
that are almost certainly true, but are not standard conformant. I'm
thinking things like "operator new is sane and thus the result is
noalias". This specific example should be controlled by something
like -foperator-new-is-sane, and probably default to on.
To me, there are two solutions. One bad solution, for various
reasons, is to create an llvm.foo for every foo function we want to
optimize. IMO, a better solution is to introduce *one* new function
attribute "is normal" or "may not be...
2009 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] malloc vs malloc
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
>
>> On Jan 11, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>>>>> There is no good reason for malloc to be an instruction anymore.
>>>>> I'd
>>>>> be very happy if it got removed. Even if we keep it, malloc/alloca
>>>>> should be extended to