search for: fooc

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fooc".

Did you mean: foo
2014 May 02
1
Authors@R: and Author field
Hi to all Authors@R: c(person("fooa","foob", role = c("aut","cre"), email = "fooa.foob@fooc.de"), person("foo1","foo2", role = c("ctb"), email = "foo1.foo2@foo3.de")) Author: fooa foob, with contributions from foo1 foo2 using r CMD check --as-cran .. (R 3.1 and Windows) I get an error Author field differs from that...
2011 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] vestiges of multiple return values
Hi, I was trying to remove some old code that handles ReturnInsts with more than 1 operand -- see attached patch -- when I stumbled across test/Assembler/aggregate-return-single-value.ll: define { i32 } @fooa() nounwind { ret i32 0 } ... define [1 x i32] @fooc() nounwind { ret i32 0 } Is there really any need to handle these odd cases, where the type of the value being returned doesn't match the return type of the function? Thanks, Jay. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: multiple-return.diff Type:...
2013 May 23
0
Code compilation: Drop certain statements in a function before calling it multiple times?
...r (k in 1:1e5) foo()); > tT <- system.time(for (k in 1:1e5) fooT()); > tT/t user system elapsed 0.6635514 NaN 0.6605505 I am aware of the 'compiler' package, which is great, but as far as I understand the above speed up when dropping statements still applies; > fooC <- compiler::cmpfun(foo); > fooTC <- compiler::cmpfun(fooT); > tC <- system.time(for (k in 1:1e5) fooC()); > tTC <- system.time(for (k in 1:1e5) fooTC()); > tTC/tC user system elapsed 0.6521739 NaN 0.6400000 Thanks, Henrik PS. The same idea of compilation...