Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fooc".
Did you mean:
foo
2014 May 02
1
Authors@R: and Author field
Hi to all
Authors@R: c(person("fooa","foob", role = c("aut","cre"),
email = "fooa.foob@fooc.de"),
person("foo1","foo2", role = c("ctb"),
email = "foo1.foo2@foo3.de"))
Author: fooa foob, with contributions from foo1 foo2
using r CMD check --as-cran .. (R 3.1 and Windows) I get an error
Author field differs from that...
2011 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] vestiges of multiple return values
Hi,
I was trying to remove some old code that handles ReturnInsts with
more than 1 operand -- see attached patch -- when I stumbled across
test/Assembler/aggregate-return-single-value.ll:
define { i32 } @fooa() nounwind {
ret i32 0
}
...
define [1 x i32] @fooc() nounwind {
ret i32 0
}
Is there really any need to handle these odd cases, where the type of
the value being returned doesn't match the return type of the
function?
Thanks,
Jay.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: multiple-return.diff
Type:...
2013 May 23
0
Code compilation: Drop certain statements in a function before calling it multiple times?
...r (k in 1:1e5) foo());
> tT <- system.time(for (k in 1:1e5) fooT());
> tT/t
user system elapsed
0.6635514 NaN 0.6605505
I am aware of the 'compiler' package, which is great, but as far as I
understand the above speed up when dropping statements still applies;
> fooC <- compiler::cmpfun(foo);
> fooTC <- compiler::cmpfun(fooT);
> tC <- system.time(for (k in 1:1e5) fooC());
> tTC <- system.time(for (k in 1:1e5) fooTC());
> tTC/tC
user system elapsed
0.6521739 NaN 0.6400000
Thanks,
Henrik
PS. The same idea of compilation...