search for: foobar200

well when i streamed the station using foobar.. then foobar2000 displayed the metadata correctly... but at that time.. when i checked out status2.xml, stats.xsl and stats.xml , the metadata is displaced incorrectly.. two songs behind.. i've tested the stream broadcasting using winamp2, foobar200 w/ oddcast dsp plug in. you can check out my station at...

...al Message----- From: Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> To: icecast@xiph.org Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:04:48 +1100 Subject: Re: [icecast] metadata update is delayed for 2 songs On Monday 29 December 2003 14:54, Phi Tran wrote: > well > > when i streamed the station using foobar.. then foobar2000 displayed the > metadata correctly... > > but at that time.. when i checked out status2.xml, stats.xsl and stats.xml > , the metadata is displaced incorrectly.. two songs behind.. > > i've tested the stream broadcasting using winamp2, foobar200 w/ oddcast dsp > plug in. &g...

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after encode"? ReplayGain, as the name implies, works by calculating a scaling-factor that should be used during play...

Hello everyone, I'm new to this flac thing (started about a week ago) but I have read a lot about flac and replaygain. As far as I understand it, replaygain is lossless in the sense that I can tell my player to ignore the settings or I can even use foobar2000 to remove the tags entirely, hence getting back to the original audio. If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, unlike ReplayGain scan afte...