search for: foo3

Thank you very much for your useful suggestions. These are exactly what I was looking for. foo <- list(foo1, foo2, foo3) lapply(foo, function(x) matrix(unlist(x), nrow = length(x), byrow = TRUE)) or lapply(foo, function(x) do.call('rbind', x)) Best, Muhammad Subianto On 4/11/06, Muhammad Subianto <msubianto at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > I have a result my experiment like this below (here m...

Dear all, I have a result my experiment like this below (here my toy example): foo1 <- list() foo1[[1]] <- c(10, 20, 30) foo1[[2]] <- c(11, 21, 31) foo2 <- list() foo2[[1]] <- c(100, 200, 300) foo2[[2]] <- c(110, 210, 310) foo3 <- list() foo3[[1]] <- c(1000, 2000, 3000) foo3[[2]] <- c(1100, 2100, 3100) list(foo1,foo2,foo3) The result: > list(foo1,foo2,foo3) [[1]] [[1]][[1]] [1] 10 20 30 [[1]][[2]] [1] 11 21 31 [[2]] [[2]][[1]] [1] 100 200 300 [[2]][[2]] [1] 110 210 310 [[3]] [[3]][[1]] [1] 1000 2000 3000...

Dear List: In short, I am writing a number of functions as building blocks for other functions and have some questions about scoping and passing arguments. Suppose I have functions foo1, foo2, and foo3 such that: foo1<-function(a=1,b=TRUE,c=FALSE){#do stuff}; foo2<-function(x=1,y=FALSE,z=c(1,2,3,4)){#do stuff}; foo3<-function(lambda,...){lambda*foo1()*foo2()}; I want to be able to pass a,b,c,x,y,z to the functions foo1 and foo2 though foo3 (whether I define default values or not)....

I have a general style question about R coding. Suppose I'm writing a function (foo1) that calls other functions (foo2, foo3, ...) which have complicated argument lists (e.g. optim(), plot()), _and_ I may be calling several different functions in the body of foo1. Since foo2 and foo3 have different sets of arguments, I can't just use "..." ; I did write some code a while ago that would look at formals() to...

..., What does that tool does besides what LLVM linker already does? I don't think my problem is in linking both modules, I think LLVM linker does the job for me, the issue is when changing the called function to call another function (in the example previously provided, to change it from foo2 to foo3, and adjusting the function parameter's references). Regards, Daniel Moya El dom., 2 de sep. de 2018 a la(s) 17:00, Ahmad Nouralizadeh Khorrami ( ahmad.llvm at gmail.com) escribió: > Hi. > Besides the LLVM linker, you can also use this tool: > https://github.com/travitch/whole-progr...

...thanks for the answer, I'm still facing issues, I'll do my best to explain my situation, as I explained, I have two modules, each one with its own main and functions, I would like to replace in the *oldModule* a function call that is calling *foo2* (defined in *oldModule*) to instead call *foo3*, which is defined in the *refModule. *So in summary, I have: 1. The original instruction call, defined in the main function of the oldModule, who is a calling function to foo2, I'll name it *oInst *(original Instruction) 2. The "new" instruction call, defined in the mai...

...module to another one. I'm still facing the issue with the *llvm::SmallVectorImpl< llvm::ReturnInst *> &Returns *argument for the *CloneFunctionInto, *can anyone please give an example of use of that function? I guess that's the only way because otherwise if I move the blocks from foo3 in the refModule to the oldModule, the references of the moved block still point to the arguments of foo3 defined in the refModule, and I don't know how to go instruction by instruction in all the moved blocks and correct the reference to point to the arguments in the oldModule's new functi...

...*refMod_copy = refMod.get(); addFunction(origMod_copy, refMod_copy, newFuncName, oldFuncName); printModule(origMod_copy); std::cout << "Finish\n"; // Make sure the program finished } int main() { std::string oldFuncName = "foo2"; std::string newFuncName = "foo3"; replaceFunctions(oldFuncName, newFuncName); return 0; } The complete error after printing the module (I know the error it's after the program's execution because the "Finish" is printed before): Finish While deleting: i32 % Use still stuck around after Def is destroy...

...FALSE) setMethod("foo", signature(x = "missing"), function(x = 3) x) setGeneric("foo2", function(x = 1) {x; standardGeneric("foo2")}, useAsDefault = FALSE) setMethod("foo2", signature(x = "missing"), function(x = 3) x) setGeneric("foo3", function(x = 1) {x<-2; standardGeneric("foo3")}, useAsDefault = FALSE) setMethod("foo3", signature(x = "missing"), function(x = 3) x) setMethod("foo3", signature(x = "numeric"), function(x = 3) x^2) foo() # returns 3 foo2() # returns...

...anyways. For example, the original function is: define i32 @foo2(i32 %a, i32 %b) #0 { entry: %a.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %b.addr = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %a, i32* %a.addr, align 4 store i32 %b, i32* %b.addr, align 4 And the function that is going to replace that is: define i32 @foo3(i32 %a, i32 %b) #0 { entry: %a.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %b.addr = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %a, i32* %a.addr, align 4 store i32 %b, i32* %b.addr, align 4 So they are pretty much the same except for the name (the functions differ later in the code, but the error happens at the beginni...

...internet. To begin with, as the name implies (and also from some errors that I got) the ValueToValueMapTy takes a std::pair<llvm::Value, llvm::Value>, but what I need is to map the arguments (llvm::Attribute) of both functions (the first argument of foo2 is equivalent to the first argument of foo3, and so on), however, apparently there's no transformation from a llvm::Attribute to a llvm::Value. I'm using the function getAttribute <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#ab2a5fc8baaee7e74dbe47d848508745a> (unsigned <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classunsigned.html>...

...the name implies (and also from some errors that I got) the >> ValueToValueMapTy takes a std::pair<llvm::Value, llvm::Value>, but what I >> need is to map the arguments (llvm::Attribute) of both functions (the first >> argument of foo2 is equivalent to the first argument of foo3, and so on), >> however, apparently there's no transformation from a llvm::Attribute to a >> llvm::Value. I'm using the function getAttribute >> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#ab2a5fc8baaee7e74dbe47d848508745a> >> (unsigned <http://llvm...

...For some reason, I would like to use functions bellow (see example code bellow), but instead I get the following error message: *Error in foo2(...) : unused argument(s) (arg3 = 3)* #--------------------- # example code #--------------------- foo1 <- function(arg1,...) { print(arg1) foo2(...) foo3(...) } foo2 <- function(arg2) { print(arg2) } foo3 <- function(arg3) { print(arg3) } foo1(arg1 = 1, arg2 = 2, arg3 =3) #--------------------- I tried looking through the R Language Definition, but couldn't find something that helped me understand the issue (way it should happen, a...

Hi the list In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have: Depends: foo1 Imports: foo2 Suggest: foo3 Enhence: foo4 If I understand correctly, to install foo0 on my computer, I need to already have foo1, foo2, foo3. foo4 is not necessary. I my R sesssion, when I will write: library(foo0), then the package foo1 will be attach. foo2, foo3 and foo4 will not. Is that correct? But what is the diffe...

...doubtless a dumb question, but I have scant experience in R. It would be very convenient in doing lots of plots to be able to do them in a loop that stepped through a vector of variable names. For example one could say x<-("mydates") y<-c("foo1","foo2","foo3") #where "foon" were vectors plot(x,y[1],type="n") points(x,y[1]) points(x,y[2],pch=2) points(x,y[3],pch=3) This is pretty easy in Perl, but of course Perl is not for plotting. Of course one could construct a data structure in R that would hold what was wanted and maybe...

...could be shorter) B = A[A$y<=5,c("x","y",uv)] names(B)[3] = "value" # rem: cannot use rename since rename(B,c(uv="value")) would not work qplot(x, y, fill=value, data=B, geom="tile") # or # ggplot(B,aes(x=x,y=y,fill=value)) + geom_tile() } foo3 <- function(uv="u") { # solution 3: use the data argument and perform the extraction directly in it # (elegant and powerful but can't make it work) ggplot(A[A$y<=5,c("x","y",uv)],aes(x=x,y=y,fill=???)) + geom_tile() # or ggplot(A[A$y<=5,],aes(x=x,y=...

Hi all, Working with S4 object, I definine two class foo1 and foo2. I define '[' (resp. '[<-') for the two classes. Then I define a third class foo3 that inherit from both foo1 and foo2. Is there a way to make '[' (resp. '[<-') for foo3 inherit from '[' (resp. '[<-') for foo1 and foo2? Thanks Christophe

Hi, I have several data structures (xts structures). I then have a list of the names of those objects. I'd like to access the object by name. For example: foo1 <- as.xts(....) foo2 <- as.xts(...) foo3 <- as.xts(...) structs <- c("foo1", "foo2", "foo3") for (thisOne in structs){ print(thisOne$colA) } The above fails. Clearly I'm missing a step translating the name to the object. Suggestions? Thanks -- Noah Silverman UCLA Department of Statistics 8...

This is just a note/wishlist/for the record: With foo1 <- function() { res; } foo2 <- function() { for (i in c()) res <- 1; res; } foo3 <- function() { while (FALSE) res <- 1; res; } foo4 <- function() { if (FALSE) res <- 1; res; } we get: > foo1() Error in foo1() : object 'res' not found > foo2() Error in foo2() : object 'res' not found > foo3() Error in foo3() : object 'res'...

I have the following list of strings: x <- c("foo, foo2, foo3", "bar", "qux, qux1") what I want to do is to obtain foo, bar qux Namely for each element in the vector obtain only string before the first comma. What's the way to do it? - G.V. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]