search for: follow_link

ocfs2 was hand-calling vfs_follow_link(), but there's no point to that. Let's use page_follow_link_light() and nd_set_link(). Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/symlink.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff...

...-upload-precheck.py b/output/rhv-upload-precheck.py > index 1dc1b8498a..35ea021032 100644 > --- a/output/rhv-upload-precheck.py > +++ b/output/rhv-upload-precheck.py > @@ -81,7 +81,12 @@ datacenter = data_centers[0] > > # Get the storage domain. > storage_domains = connection.follow_link(datacenter.storage_domains) > -storage_domain = [sd for sd in storage_domains if sd.name == params['output_storage']][0] > +try: > + storage_domain = [sd for sd in storage_domains \ > + if sd.name == params['output_storage']][0] Using `\` may wor...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986386 My RHV instance is dead at the moment so I didn't do much more than check this compiles and passes the one test we have. Also I want to spend as little time as possible on RHV outputs for virt-v2v since the RHV product will be discontinued soon. I did want to point out some things: - The preceeding code is probably wrong.

...nter + # (shouldn't happen, would fail on disk creation). + raise RuntimeError("The storage domain ‘%s’ is not attached to a DC" % + (params['output_storage'])) +datacenter = data_centers[0] + +# Get the storage domain. +storage_domains = connection.follow_link(datacenter.storage_domains) +storage_domain = [sd for sd in storage_domains if sd.name == params['output_storage']][0] + +# Get the cluster. +clusters = connection.follow_link(datacenter.clusters) +clusters = [cluster for cluster in clusters if cluster.name == params['rhv_cluster']]...

All, Please review the patches backported to 1.4 from mainline. Sunil

When trying to move my root to a btrfs filesystem, I found a missing feature (or a bug). It's not possible to create device files. To reproduce, run this on a btrfs filesystem: mknod test c 1 1 result: mknod: `test': Operation not permitted Frank

...6:29 2001 +++ linux-2.4.17-uml/fs/namei.c Fri Feb 8 02:53:36 2002 @@ -1052,6 +1052,11 @@ error = -ENOENT; if (!dentry->d_inode) goto exit_dput; + + error = -EIO; + if (is_bad_inode(dentry->d_inode)) + goto exit_dput; + if (dentry->d_inode->i_op && dentry->d_inode->i_op->follow_link) goto do_link; an open() does not make any sense on a bad inode so i see no reason for not breaking the branch at this point. any comments? please let me know if you're able to trigger this effect on older 2.4 kernels. btw, version 2.2.19 is not tainted. greets, daniel --

...__init__.py +++ b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload-module/ovirtsdk4/__init__.py @@ -32,12 +32,16 @@ class Connection(object): ca_file = None, log = None, insecure = False, + debug=True, ): pass def close(self): pass + def follow_link(self, objs): + return objs + def system_service(self): return SystemService() @@ -60,26 +64,31 @@ class SystemService(object): def vms_service(self): return VmsService() +class ClusterService(object): + def get(self): + return types.Cluster() + clas...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 Summary: Error when rsync encounters empty symlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: kai@kaishome.de

hi, I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I''d start with a dead simple scenario: The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the home page, and begin exploring public pages from there. So, that seems like a good first story to spec out. And I''d really like to extract the actual link from the rendered page (rather than just

This patch series fixes various issues in the rhv-upload output mode: - properly find and use RHV resources - cleanup orphan disks, and possibly the current disk transfer on failure In reality, the first 4 patches deal with resources, and the other 4 with cleanups. The latter block can be theoretically sent alone -- I just happened to start working on it as part of my "let's fix