Displaying 20 results from an estimated 13855 matches for "folks".
2016 Mar 11
7
Any objections to re-sorting #include lines with clang-format/clang-tidy?
The crazy clang-format folks have taught it to sort includes, and
clang-tidy has a nice way to run it across all of LLVM and Clang.
Before I just submit the fixes (and any bug reports to the clang-format
folks if it sorts things weirdly) I wanted to double check that folks would
be ok with this. My understanding is that the s...
2014 Jul 03
6
[LLVMdev] The poor organization of TargetLowering (and related subclasses) is out of hand
(Sorry for CC'ing piles of people, but didn't want folks to miss this in
the mailing list churn.)
See the subject. The problem is in the target-independent code generator
and especially in the x86 backend.
I would like to fix it. This will be a mechanical change just organizing
code in a way that makes it easy and fast to find methods and related
stati...
2009 Oct 08
2
lattice: passing multiple lty values to the key/legend
hi all,
It's not clear to me how (or if) I can pass multiple values for lty to a key in xyplot?
I've tried: lines=list(lty=1:3), to no avail.
Do I need to use something other than auto.key?
(Deepayan, if you're out there, I have your book and must admit the answer isn't jumping out at me.)
thanks in advance!
Michael Folkes
example code:
#____________________________
2014 Jan 07
7
[LLVMdev] Build-bot host compiler upgrades and C++11!
Greetings, starting a new thread and CC-ing all the folks I could think of
that are likely running bots for LLVM. If I've missed any, sorry, please
add them.
As lots of folks have been mentioning, it's time to switch LLVM (and most
subprojects) to use C++11. The first step is establishing a new baseline of
compiler versions that are supported[1]:...
2016 Jun 30
9
FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct
Hello folks,
As mentioned some time ago[1], we’ve had a long (looooooong) series of
discussions about establishing a code-of-conduct for the LLVM project as a
whole over on the llvm-dev thread and the http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741
code review.
The discussion has largely died down for some time, and towards...
2013 Sep 24
4
[LLVMdev] Enabling MI Scheduler on x86 (was Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3)
...e improving on the same baseline.
While I'm generally really excited by this, I would ask for a bit more
staging of this change.
Specifically, I would really like for a single, clear switch to enable
exactly what you want benchmark data on *before* it becomes the default,
and to give various folks time to run benchmarks and report serious
regressions.
I don't want our ability to ship LLVM from top-of-tree to be seriously
impaired by this, and enabling a feature that can have dramatic performance
impact without a giving folks a really simple way to try it out and a
period of time to run...
2013 Sep 09
1
Hmisc binconf function value interpretation during narrow confidence intervals
Hello all,
I've been using binconf (package Hmisc) at a range of alpha values and
noticed that using the 'Wilson' method when alpha is larger (i.e. narrow
CI), results in the upper value being smaller than the lower value. The
'exact' and 'asymptotic' methods give results in the realm I'd expect.
But the help file suggests:
"Following Agresti and Coull, the
2018 May 17
15
RFC: Removing TerminatorInst, simplifying calls
...much simpler IR type system and
implementation. The code interacting with instructions should also be much
more consistent and clear w/o the awkward CallSite "abstraction".
Thoughts? Seem OK at a high level?
Happy to bikeshed the name `CallBase`, but I've discussed this with several
folks, including Reid and Chris and nothing better came up really.
`CallSite` might be nicer, but the confusion with the *existing* type seems
much more problematic.
Assuming folks are happy with this direction, are there any incremental
patches that folks would like to see in pre-commit review? I'...
2011 Mar 04
4
Floating points and floor() ?
Perhaps somebody could clarify for me if the following is a floating
point matter or otherwise, and how am I to correct for it?
> floor(100*.1)
[1] 10
> 100*(1.0-.9)
[1] 10
> floor(100*(1-0.9))
[1] 9
Thanks!
Michael
_______________________________________________________
Michael Folkes
Salmon Stock Assessment
Canadian Dept. of Fisheries & Oceans
Pacific Biological Station
2004 Aug 31
3
All you polycom folks.....
Just out of curiosity,
What version of CVS and Polycom SIP software are you running happily?
Are you running SIP 2.3.0 yet? 2.2.0? 2.1.0?
I tried upgrading the CVS yesterday, with a mixed mode of 2.2 and 2.1 with
poor results. Transferring did not work as expected. Using the # key to
do blind transfers after a call was on hold did not work.
Just curious.
Thanks,
- Brent
2015 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] Would like to force one minor, mechanical change on out-of-tree users of the old pass manager
Greetings folks.
I had really wanted out-of-tree folks to be able to make only a single
change to their code due to the new pass manager; essentially, by the time
they had to touch the code at all I wanted them to be able to port
completely to the new pass manager.
However, Richard has raised the issue that this...
2011 Oct 04
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR
On 5 October 2011 00:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> 1. The native client folks trying to use LLVM IR as a portable representation that abstracts arbitrary C calling conventions. This doesn't work because the frontend has to know the C calling conventions of the target.
(...)
> 2. The OpenCL folks trying to turn LLVM into a portable abstraction language by introducing...
2006 Apr 11
3
Web services and security
Hi all,
How do folks generally secure their Rails web services? A password in a config
file? A ''webservice'' user in a ''Users'' table with its own password? LDAP
authentication for every method? Only authenticate on the "important" methods?
Something else I''...
2015 Feb 24
9
[LLVMdev] RFC: PerfGuide for frontend authors
...gives you
dereferenceability information
- Use function attributes where possible (nonnull, deref, etc..)
- Be ware of ordered and atomic memory operations (not well optimized),
depending on source language, might be faster to use fences.
- Range checks - make sure you test with the IRCE pass
If folks are happy with the idea of having such a document, I volunteer
to create version 0.1 with one or two items. After that, we can add to
it as folks encounter ideas. The initial content will be fairly
minimal, I just want a link I can send to folks in reviews to record
comments made. :)
Philip
2003 Sep 01
4
Sip Software from Nero Folk?
http://www.nero.com/us/631911127302064.html
Have you all seen this?
Its a SIP softphone put out by the people that do the CD burning software Nero...
Check it out it works with *
Dave
2004 Aug 09
1
How do folks handle NAT routing?
I'm interested to hear how folks are handling NAT SIP routing issues "in the
wild" for commercial use.
Are you using a commerical SIP-aware NAT router solution? If so, what?
Are you using a software SIP-proxy like SER or siproxd? If so, which?
Do you set everything to "canreinvite=no" in sip.conf?
Any comme...
2018 Oct 07
1
OffTopic: What is the web git frontend you folks are using?
Hi, folks,
Silly question. When I go to: https://git.xiph.org/?p=opus.git what is
the program serving that up?
Thanks,
-a
2013 Oct 05
3
[LLVMdev] Enabling MI Scheduler on x86 (was Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3)
...gt;>
>> While I'm generally really excited by this, I would ask for a bit more staging of this change.
>>
>> Specifically, I would really like for a single, clear switch to enable exactly what you want benchmark data on *before* it becomes the default, and to give various folks time to run benchmarks and report serious regressions.
>>
>> I don't want our ability to ship LLVM from top-of-tree to be seriously impaired by this, and enabling a feature that can have dramatic performance impact without a giving folks a really simple way to try it out and a peri...
2011 Apr 04
2
RODBC excel - need to preserve (or extract) numeric column names
I'm using RODBC to read an excel file (not mine!). But I'm struggling to find a way to preserve the column names that have a numeric value. sqlFetch() drops the value and calls them f1, f2, f3,... (ie field number). this is a different approach from read.csv, which will append "V" prior to the numeric column name. sqlFetch isn't so helpful.
Is there a way to get the
2020 Sep 01
2
Filename's in DIBuileder
Hi All ,
We have a scenario in our debugger to handle the file index in the
debug_ine info like
$llvm-dwarfdump -debug-line test.o
file_names[ 1]:
name: "test.cpp"
dir_index: 0
mod_time: 0x00000000
length: 0x00000000
file_names[ 2]:
name: "test.cpp"
dir_index: 1
mod_time: 0x00000000
length: 0x00000000