search for: folio_ops

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "folio_ops".

2024 Nov 12
1
[RFC PATCH v1 00/10] mm: Introduce and use folio_owner_ops
...te that this has "owner_ops" meaning. We'll have to make hugetlb not use folio->private and make others not use bitX. Might be harder and overkill, because right now we only really need the callback when refcount==0. (c) Use some other indication that folio->private contains folio_ops. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
2024 Nov 13
2
[RFC PATCH v1 00/10] mm: Introduce and use folio_owner_ops
...;owner_ops" > meaning. We'll have to make hugetlb not use folio->private and make others > not use bitX. Might be harder and overkill, because right now we only really > need the callback when refcount==0. > > (c) Use some other indication that folio->private contains folio_ops. I really don't want to use folio_ops / folio_owner_ops. I read https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGtprH_JP2w-4rq02h_Ugvq5KuHX7TUvegOS7xUs_iy5hriE7g at mail.gmail.com/ and I still don't understand what you're trying to do. Would it work to use aops->free_folio() to notify you when the...
2024 Nov 12
1
[RFC PATCH v1 00/10] mm: Introduce and use folio_owner_ops
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:10:06AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 12.11.24 06:26, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 08:26:54AM +0000, Fuad Tabba wrote: > > > Thanks for your comments Jason, and for clarifying my cover letter > > > David. I think David has covered everything, and I'll make sure to > > > clarify this in the cover letter