search for: foldbug

...ce/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-05-CastFPToUint SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-10-13-SwitchTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-10-29-ScalarReplBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-02-02-NegativeZero SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-06-20-StaticBitfieldInit SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-11-28-GlobalBoolLayout SingleSo...

...ce/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/initp1 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-12-MinIntProblem | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-04-10-BitfieldTest | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-14-AtExit...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg | 0.0108 3092 0.0166 * 0.0157 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug | 0.0029 528 0.0019 * 0.0018 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest | 0.0022 568 0.0020 * 0.0018...

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg | 0.0080 3072 0.0160 * 0.0160 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug | 0.0040 512 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest | 0.0040 568 0.0000 * 0.0040...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg | 0.0151 3064 0.0141 * 0.0133 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug | 0.0034 520 0.0014 * 0.0069 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest | 0.0062 560 0.0015 * 0.0015...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg | 0.0068 4532 * * * | 0.00 * * * * | n/a n/a n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug | 0.0012 552 0.0009 * 0.0009 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest | 0.0012 588 0.0010 * 0.0010...

...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11-VaListArg                              | > 0.0100 3108     0.0100      *                0.0300      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.04 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20-FoldBug                                | > 0.0000 568      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18-BitFieldTest                           | > 0.0000 612      0.0000      *        ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-11- > VaListArg | 0.0100 3108 0.0100 > * 0.0300 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.04 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-20- > FoldBug | 0.0000 568 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-09-18- > BitFieldTest | 0.0000 612 0.0000...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...09-SignedArgs.ll 4 19145 0 0.01 19136 0 0.01 19136 2003-07-10-SignConversions.ll 3 4961 0 0.01 4952 0 0.01 4952 2003-08-05-CastFPToUint.ll 4 3762 0 0.01 3753 0 0.01 3753 2003-08-11-VaListArg.ll 4 25506 0 0.01 25497 0 0.01 25497 2003-08-20-EnumSizeProblem.ll 2 1358 0 0.01 1342 0 0.01 1342 2003-08-20-FoldBug.ll 2 2304 0 0.01 2295 0 0.01 2295 2003-09-18-BitFieldTest.ll 2 2547 0 0.01 2538 0 0.01 2538 2003-09-29-NonPODsByValue.ll 4 5850 0 0.01 5834 0 0.01 5834 2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers.ll 1 2336 0 0.01 2324 0 0.01 2324 2003-10-13-SwitchTest.ll 1 2458 0 0.01 2449 0 0.01 2449 2003-10-29-ScalarReplBug...