search for: foiled

Hi, I would like to turn some of our simulation codes out to pasture and string some of them together by draping them in web services. I''m looking for a RESTful Camping tutorial to get started ... pointers appreciated. Some simple example applications: airfoil force calculator: feed it an airfoil geometry, an angle of attack, and a Mach number, and it returns the lift, drag, and

Understand that it's a *guess*. If this fixes or at least betters the situation, you're going to need to find a legit way to insulate these cards, or to switch cards. If it's for customers, I should hope you wouldn't be using enamelled aluminum foil. :D -----Original Message----- From: Tongbiao Li [mailto:tli@viack.com] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:20 AM To:

Thanks for the speedy response and detailed, enlightening explanation. Now I understand where the problem is, and will try out your suggestions just to further confirm my conjecture. When I am done, I have to take the foil out, though. This is a product for our customers to use, and although we've got budget for mulffing every sound card we developers use, most likely the company

Take what I say with a grain of salt: I'm an amateur and haven't actually touched Speex in any way, yet. I'm just sort of passing on personal belief from personal experience. Also, check and make sure that the microphone line is insulated. There are a number of problems with sound cards picking up interference from the host machine. The wires that run between ICs on a card

On Aug 3, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: >> >>> I feel that such optimizations may not result in any gain for PIC16 >>> >>> as PIC16 does everything on i8. >>> >> >> >> The legalize pass should turn an i64 store into 8 i8 stores >> >> then, which is essentially the same as what an {i32,i32} store

...appen, but as orthogonal independent optimizations. I think > LLVM should continue with this design. If you want to implement a single > substantial optimization pass, I would suggest FSIPSCCP as the largest > thing you should write. This is a lot of work that is going to be completely foiled by the presence of almost any opaque call at all. What's needed here is a language-independent way to exploit language-specific guarantees like C++ [basic.life]p7, i.e. that certain provenances of pointer guarantee that certain members have known, immutable values. There are analogous guarant...

...ogonal independent optimizations. I think >> LLVM should continue with this design. If you want to implement a single >> substantial optimization pass, I would suggest FSIPSCCP as the largest >> thing you should write. > > This is a lot of work that is going to be completely foiled by the presence > of almost any opaque call at all. Yes, but it's still useful. Also, anything based on knowing the type hierarchy could be foiled by new derivations in other translation units, or that show up with dlopen. > What's needed here is a language-independent way to expl...

> > The optimizer can currently combine stores (i32, i32) to a single > > i64 store operation. Is there a way to disable that? > > Not currently. There are some ideas floating around about > including in TargetData a list of integer types that the > target natively supports, which would allow instcombine > and other passes to make more informed decisions, but > at

Hi For .LL like: define void @Func() { %var1 = alloca double store double 0x40bb580000000000, double* %var1 ret void } ppc32 output is: ... lis 3, 16571 ori 3, 3, 22528 li 4, 0 stw 3, 8(1) stw 4, 12(1) ... I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter that I would like to be able to run

Sub: INTRODUCTION FOR SUPPLY OF SPECIAL CABLES We have pleasure in introducing ourselves as manufacturer's of specialised cables for over two decades catering to the needs of the Fertilizer, Chemical, Petrochemical, Oil & Gas, Steel, Power, Cement, Ceramic, Glass, Paper, Sugar and other industries. The following are some of the cables made by us: ANY CABLE, ANY TIME, ANY QUANTITY

On Aug 3, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: >> >> We are currently doing this, however I think disabling such >> optimizations is a much better solution. > > An LLVM design goal is that backends should be able to outsmart > instcombine when necessary, rather than having instcombine be able > to disable parts of itself in order to avoid foiling the backends. >

...whole business into a character object and used: NextMethod("print") However, instead of not printing quotes and displaying the usual representation of the string, I get the whole string, newlines and all, in quotes. My attempt to shamelessly copy someone else's print method was foiled as most of them don't display when one types the function name. I presume this is a feature of namespaces. Needless to say, searching the archives for "print & method" retrieved a cornucopia of useless information. I wonder if anyone would be kind enough to inform me where to...

...timizations. I think >>> LLVM should continue with this design. If you want to implement a single >>> substantial optimization pass, I would suggest FSIPSCCP as the largest >>> thing you should write. >> >> This is a lot of work that is going to be completely foiled by the presence >> of almost any opaque call at all. > > Yes, but it's still useful. Sure, there are generally applications for any general optimization you can suggest. I'm just saying that FSIPSCCP is not really a very compelling way to do devirtualization. > Also, anyt...

Hi, This is updated xen vMCE design foils, according to comments from community recently. This foils focus on vMCE part of Xen MCA, so as Keir said, it''s some dense. Later Will will present a document to elaborate more, including Intel MCA and surrounding features and Xen implementation. Thanks, Jinsong

...after an existing installation has already been configured. The exploit requires the user to be able to write executables in the directory they are chrooting to, and create hard links to SUID binaries within that directory structure, so by preventing either of these two things, the exploit will be foiled. System administrators can accomplish this by careful configuration of filesystem permissions, mount points, and mount options (such as no_exec, no_suid, etc.). I will not go into details since the far better solution is to upgrade. Fix --- The 2.3.0 release of rssh fixes this problem by forcing...

On Monday 03 August 2009 18:01, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 3, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > >> We are currently doing this, however I think disabling such > >> optimizations is a much better solution. > > > > An LLVM design goal is that backends should be able to outsmart > > instcombine when necessary, rather than having instcombine be able >

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Emil Mikulic wrote: > LLVMers, given the same endianness and pointersize, can one mix and > match LLVM bytecode files produced on different platforms? No, not in general. For example, on the mac, printf it often #defined to printf$ldbl, which doesn't exist on linux. System headers generally foil the ability to move stuff around like that. -Chris --

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter > that I would like to be able to run on both little- and big-endian > platforms. The split stw's mean that i32s of the f64 are swapped in > memory on little-endian (thus foiling native-code interop).

R listers: I have been foiled by plotmath! (in R 2.01,Windows 2000) The task: Plot a normal density and label the ticks as mu - 3 sigma, mu - 2 sigma, ...., mu + 3 sigma, where the mu's and sigmas appear as Greek symbols, of course. The following code does this: x<-seq(-3,to=3,by=.01) y<-dnorm(x) plot(x,y,type=...

...rtain people access to the machine. Preferably, just a command line login. Unfortunately, the only things I saw online for command line logins were commercial products. I thought about firing up the telnet service, but it seems to require NTLM authentication. My attempts to configure ntml were foiled - for some reason the OS thinks I don''t have admin privileges (I do). Any suggestions? I''m willing to pay money if you think there''s a commercial product out there that''s worth it (I saw rlogind from MKS Software - any good?), but I would prefer a free soluti...