search for: foil

Hi, I would like to turn some of our simulation codes out to pasture and string some of them together by draping them in web services. I''m looking for a RESTful Camping tutorial to get started ... pointers appreciated. Some simple example applications: airfoil force calculator: feed it an airfoil geometry, an angle of attack, and a Mach number, and it returns the lift, drag, and pitching moment ablation: feed it surface temperature and thermal protection material properties, and it returns surface blowing rate and specie mass fractions. Thank...

Understand that it's a *guess*. If this fixes or at least betters the situation, you're going to need to find a legit way to insulate these cards, or to switch cards. If it's for customers, I should hope you wouldn't be using enamelled aluminum foil. :D -----Original Message----- From: Tongbiao Li [mailto:tli@viack.com] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:20 AM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: RE: [speex-dev] speex_denoise on non-microphone noise (static ?) <p><p>Thanks for the speedy response and detailed, enlightening explana...

Thanks for the speedy response and detailed, enlightening explanation. Now I understand where the problem is, and will try out your suggestions just to further confirm my conjecture. When I am done, I have to take the foil out, though. This is a product for our customers to use, and although we've got budget for mulffing every sound card we developers use, most likely the company won't pay for a foil per licensed customer. So I still have to make our denoising work in this field scenario. -----Ori...

...adding metal in an uncontrolled fashion to your computer is *begging* for something to touch something else, and give you a short, potentially destroying hardware. That all said, if you're on short time and short budget, you could try the following (NOT A GOOD IDEA): take a piece of aluminum foil (aluminum is diamagnetic and therefore has good insulation properties regarding emf.) open your case and turn your computer off. Wrap the foil most of the way around the card, taking care to leave the foil in a shape that can be removed without distortion. Remove the foil, and coat it with a nonc...

...t;> > > We are currently doing this, however I think disabling such > optimizations is a much better solution. An LLVM design goal is that backends should be able to outsmart instcombine when necessary, rather than having instcombine be able to disable parts of itself in order to avoid foiling the backends. Practicality sometimes steers elsewhere of course. Please explain why you think suppressing this particular optimization is better; it isn't obvious how it would look different in the end. Dan

...appen, but as orthogonal independent optimizations. I think > LLVM should continue with this design. If you want to implement a single > substantial optimization pass, I would suggest FSIPSCCP as the largest > thing you should write. This is a lot of work that is going to be completely foiled by the presence of almost any opaque call at all. What's needed here is a language-independent way to exploit language-specific guarantees like C++ [basic.life]p7, i.e. that certain provenances of pointer guarantee that certain members have known, immutable values. There are analogous guara...

...ogonal independent optimizations. I think >> LLVM should continue with this design. If you want to implement a single >> substantial optimization pass, I would suggest FSIPSCCP as the largest >> thing you should write. > > This is a lot of work that is going to be completely foiled by the presence > of almost any opaque call at all. Yes, but it's still useful. Also, anything based on knowing the type hierarchy could be foiled by new derivations in other translation units, or that show up with dlopen. > What's needed here is a language-independent way to ex...

> > The optimizer can currently combine stores (i32, i32) to a single > > i64 store operation. Is there a way to disable that? > > Not currently. There are some ideas floating around about > including in TargetData a list of integer types that the > target natively supports, which would allow instcombine > and other passes to make more informed decisions, but > at

...stw 3, 8(1) stw 4, 12(1) ... I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter that I would like to be able to run on both little- and big-endian platforms. The split stw's mean that i32s of the f64 are swapped in memory on little-endian (thus foiling native-code interop). Can anyone suggest where I should look to lower this store differently? (ideally by libcall-ing a function that takes 2 i32s). thanks, scott

..., Paper, Sugar and other industries. The following are some of the cables made by us: ANY CABLE, ANY TIME, ANY QUANTITY FLEXIBLE WIRES & CABLES Single Core Wire Wires Multicore Flexible Cables Flexible Power Cables FLEXIBLE SHIELDED CABLES DATADSHIELD Foil + Braid Screened SCREENCAB Braid Shielded Cables SHIELDCAB Foil + Braid Shielded TP-SHIELDCAB Foil + Braid Shielded PROCESS CONTROL CABLES POWERCON Copper Cables Control & RTD Cables Instrumentation Signal Cables - Multicore / Multipair /...

...currently doing this, however I think disabling such >> optimizations is a much better solution. > > An LLVM design goal is that backends should be able to outsmart > instcombine when necessary, rather than having instcombine be able > to disable parts of itself in order to avoid foiling the backends. > Practicality sometimes steers elsewhere of course. Please explain > why you think suppressing this particular optimization is better; > it isn't obvious how it would look different in the end. Yeah, I agree. LegalizeTypes should be able to trivially lower this. -C...

...whole business into a character object and used: NextMethod("print") However, instead of not printing quotes and displaying the usual representation of the string, I get the whole string, newlines and all, in quotes. My attempt to shamelessly copy someone else's print method was foiled as most of them don't display when one types the function name. I presume this is a feature of namespaces. Needless to say, searching the archives for "print & method" retrieved a cornucopia of useless information. I wonder if anyone would be kind enough to inform me where t...

...timizations. I think >>> LLVM should continue with this design. If you want to implement a single >>> substantial optimization pass, I would suggest FSIPSCCP as the largest >>> thing you should write. >> >> This is a lot of work that is going to be completely foiled by the presence >> of almost any opaque call at all. > > Yes, but it's still useful. Sure, there are generally applications for any general optimization you can suggest. I'm just saying that FSIPSCCP is not really a very compelling way to do devirtualization. > Also, an...

Hi, This is updated xen vMCE design foils, according to comments from community recently. This foils focus on vMCE part of Xen MCA, so as Keir said, it''s some dense. Later Will will present a document to elaborate more, including Intel MCA and surrounding features and Xen implementation. Thanks, Jinsong

...after an existing installation has already been configured. The exploit requires the user to be able to write executables in the directory they are chrooting to, and create hard links to SUID binaries within that directory structure, so by preventing either of these two things, the exploit will be foiled. System administrators can accomplish this by careful configuration of filesystem permissions, mount points, and mount options (such as no_exec, no_suid, etc.). I will not go into details since the far better solution is to upgrade. Fix --- The 2.3.0 release of rssh fixes this problem by forci...

...wever I think disabling such > >> optimizations is a much better solution. > > > > An LLVM design goal is that backends should be able to outsmart > > instcombine when necessary, rather than having instcombine be able > > to disable parts of itself in order to avoid foiling the backends. > > Practicality sometimes steers elsewhere of course. Please explain > > why you think suppressing this particular optimization is better; > > it isn't obvious how it would look different in the end. > > Yeah, I agree. LegalizeTypes should be able to t...

...ikulic wrote: > LLVMers, given the same endianness and pointersize, can one mix and > match LLVM bytecode files produced on different platforms? No, not in general. For example, on the mac, printf it often #defined to printf$ldbl, which doesn't exist on linux. System headers generally foil the ability to move stuff around like that. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

...4ck3r.net> wrote: > I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter > that I would like to be able to run on both little- and big-endian > platforms. The split stw's mean that i32s of the f64 are swapped in > memory on little-endian (thus foiling native-code interop). It's fundamentally impossible to correctly interpret using the wrong endianness, at least for general C code. Have you considered making your interpreter map memory backwards on opposite-endian platforms? -Eli

R listers: I have been foiled by plotmath! (in R 2.01,Windows 2000) The task: Plot a normal density and label the ticks as mu - 3 sigma, mu - 2 sigma, ...., mu + 3 sigma, where the mu's and sigmas appear as Greek symbols, of course. The following code does this: x<-seq(-3,to=3,by=.01) y<-dnorm(x) plot(x,y,type=&...

...rtain people access to the machine. Preferably, just a command line login. Unfortunately, the only things I saw online for command line logins were commercial products. I thought about firing up the telnet service, but it seems to require NTLM authentication. My attempts to configure ntml were foiled - for some reason the OS thinks I don''t have admin privileges (I do). Any suggestions? I''m willing to pay money if you think there''s a commercial product out there that''s worth it (I saw rlogind from MKS Software - any good?), but I would prefer a free solu...