search for: foggi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 65 matches for "foggi".

Did you mean: oggi
2007 Feb 13
3
Sending SMS from Asterisk
Hi: Say I want to build an IVR application which sends an SMS message to a mobile telephone when the caller responds to a prompt in certain way. I think I can manage the part about generating the message and building something to actually send it. The part I'm foggy about is: how would I actually get the SMS message to the carrier? Discussions with the carrier have led absolutely nowhere
2004 Jan 11
24
More words for Allison
Here's the latest batch of words to get shipped out to Allison Smith. Please submit reasonably small changes to me by tomorrow 10:00 AM Eastern time, and I'll add them. As usual, donations to what will be a ~$110 USD expense would be appreciated, as I am paying for this round out of my pocket. Please send to paypal address "jtodd@loligo.com". I did not include all
2018 Sep 18
3
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, John Stultz wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> wrote: >>> Also, I'm not entirely convinced that this "last" thing is needed at >>> all. John, what's the scenario under which we
2018 Sep 18
3
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, John Stultz wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> wrote: >>> Also, I'm not entirely convinced that this "last" thing is needed at >>> all. John, what's the scenario under which we
2018 Sep 18
2
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, John Stultz wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> wrote: > > > Also, I'm not entirely convinced that this "last" thing is needed at > > > all. John, what's the scenario under which we need it? > > > > So
2018 Sep 18
2
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, John Stultz wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> wrote: > > > Also, I'm not entirely convinced that this "last" thing is needed at > > > all. John, what's the scenario under which we need it? > > > > So
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] Best way to interface with MSVC _ftol2 runtime function for fptoui?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > X86FloatingPoint.cpp with comments is all you get. Thanks for your help, Jakob. Attached is a first-pass attempt at a patch. I don't want to post to -commits yet because I have no idea if this is fully correct, but it seems to work in simple test cases. Am I on the right track? Could this patch ever
2012 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] Best way to interface with MSVC _ftol2 runtime function for fptoui?
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Joe Groff wrote: > The integer runtime functions (_allmul, _alldiv, etc. for 64-bit > integer arithmetic) all appear to be straight-up stdcall. _ftol2 is > the only weird one. (There is an _ftol routine with the same calling > convention as _ftol2, but AFAIK it's only for backward compatibility > with older MSVC runtimes.) I'm far from an MSVC
2006 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] src to src conversion
Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am trying to use LLVM as a source to source C compiler. I use > llvm-gcc to convert file.c->file.bc. Then I use opt to run my own > compiler passes to convert file.bc->file.opt.bc. Then I use llc to > convert file.opt.bc->file.opt.c. Now, I want to use normal gcc to > compile file.opt.c into an executable. However, I'm getting the
2010 Sep 16
1
RODBC Access/Excel driver location for 64 bit Win7
Apologies, but after a fair amount of digging, I still only have a foggy understanding of the cause of this problem, due to my own ignorance. I hope to use RODBC package to connect to an Access DB when running 64 bit Win7 (R version 2.11.1, 64 bit). I have successfully done this before on a winXP machine. Currently I am unable to establish a connection using odbcConnect("") (I am
2008 May 27
3
dom0 memory limits greater than 2Gb?
The main Xen mailing list ("xen-users") generally advises users to limit the memory on dom0 to 2Gb or less. Apparently the general version of Xen has troubles with this. What''s the corresponding advice for the Xen in OpenSolaris, Nevada b87 in particular? I''ve got an X4600 with 32Gb of physical memory on it. I was originally planning to have dom0 be the general-
2014 Mar 12
4
Developing the UPS side of the UPS-NUT equation (via usbhid)
The syntax is beginning (just beginning) to make sense to me now, so I'm looking now to try and implement just a few items in the report descriptor, and then I figured I can progress from there if all goes well. The power HID docs seem to encourage drawing out your system first, and then letting the report descriptor flow from there. So, my very simplified system goes like this:
2006 Apr 25
3
[LLVMdev] src to src conversion
I am trying to use LLVM as a source to source C compiler. I use llvm-gcc to convert file.c->file.bc. Then I use opt to run my own compiler passes to convert file.bc->file.opt.bc. Then I use llc to convert file.opt.bc->file.opt.c. Now, I want to use normal gcc to compile file.opt.c into an executable. However, I'm getting the following errors: test.opt.c:89: warning:
2006 Apr 13
4
Creating an environment for a function.
I am trying to build a function in a context where the environment concept would appear to be useful. But I'm a bit foggy about this concept and would appreciate some pointers and advice. Basically the function I'm building, say foo(x,t), is a function of two variables). Depending on the value of t, foo will return one of the values f1(x), f2(x), ..., fk(x), where each of f1, ..., fk is
2009 Jan 07
9
migrate file-based vm to lvm?
I recently upgraded storage on our (first) xen server and would like to migrate the file-based vms I have in play to lvm-based storage... Can anyone point me in the right direction? Is there a way to mount a vm image file like I would using a iso image and a loopback device? Each vm''s disk file contains a partition table with root and swap partitions... In retrospect I wish I''d
2004 Jan 17
0
New sounds posted
So, per the discussion last week and generous donations, we have some new sound files with which to work. The sounds are located in: http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/sounds/ For those of you who just want to download the _new_ sounds, please fetch: http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/sounds/20040117.newsounds.tar All of the sounds in that tarball are also in the main ../sounds/ directory in
2006 Apr 28
3
persistent cookies
hello, I am trying to implement a "remember be" box for logins, however I cant seem to get it to work. I have tried the following 2 methods but neither seem to work. When i check the expiry time in firefox it always says "end of session". What is the proper way to handle this so the session cookie "_session_id" doesnt expire for a year? I tried
2009 May 01
4
How do I resize a Physical Partition in a Dom U that''s "on" a Logical Volume in the Dom 0?
Hey all, I''m trying to figure out how to re-size physical partitions in the Dom U. I''ve read up what I can find on line and finally decided to have Logical Volumes in the Dom 0 and pass them as physical volumes for use in the Dom U. Here''s an example of what I''m doing. To start in the Dom 0 I created the LV''s with lvcreate -n guest_boot -L 100M
1999 Oct 28
4
Samba on Solaris 2.5.1?
Does anyone have Samba working on Solaris 2.5.1? I posted more or less the same question a few months ago, and didn't hear anything back, but the issue has reared its head again on my end. I have Samba 2.0.0 running successfully on Solaris 2.6, but have failed in repeated attempts to get Samba running on Solaris 2.5.1. Basic symptom: I can get the daemon running, but can't connect to
2011 Nov 13
8
ioperm problem
Hi, I''m trying to port AMD VGA passthru patch to the latest XEN and vanila kernel and I got SIGSEGV in static void ati_hw_out(uint16_t hport, uint32_t data) { ioperm(gfx_info.host_pio_base, gfx_info.pio_size, 1); asm volatile ("out %1, %0"::"Nd"(hport),"a"(data)); ioperm(gfx_info.host_pio_base, gfx_info.pio_size, 0); } I tried old 2.6.32