Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "flxglm".
Did you mean:
flexlm
2005 Apr 12
1
R Package: mmlcr and/or flexmix
...+ perc_Group_nights+
perc_num_asian+ DaysBetweenStays+ CROStays+ DaysSinceLastStay+
wghtmean_median_age_pop100+ perc_num_white+ perc_num_hispanic+
perc_CROStays+ numMonthsActive+ WEBStays+ property_loyalty+ perc_NoZone+
rho+ PCR_Dummy_class+ ltgold1+ ltgold3+ p_hat_PCR, data = data, k = 2, model
= FLXglm(family = "poisson"))
rm1<-refit(m1)
summary(rm1)
Scott Geller
Advanced Analytics,
Decision Sciences Department,
InterContinental Hotels Group
770-604-5149
2007 Apr 16
1
flexmix glm warning
Dear R-helpers & Friedrich Leisch,
I'm trying to fit a mixture of regression models on attached data set
by doing the following:
agl <- read.table("agl.txt")
mod1 <- flexmix(resp~gng+csc|Subject,data=agl,
model=FLXglm(family="binomial"),k=2)
The result is a (varying) number of the following warnings:
Warning messages:
1: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in: eval(expr, envir,
enclos)
2: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in: eval(expr, envir,
enclos)
Any help with interpreting the...
2003 Nov 29
3
performance gap between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0
Dear R-help,
A colleague of mine was running some code on two of our boxes, and noticed a
rather large difference in running time. We've so far isolated the problem
to the difference between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0, but not more than that. The
exact same code took 933.5 seconds in 1.7.1, and 3594.4 seconds in 1.8.1, on
the same box.
Basically, the code calls boot() to bootstrap fitting mixture