search for: fluss

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "fluss".

Did you mean: flush
2006 Feb 09
2
write.table
Hello! When using the command "write.table" I want to convert the format: 5e-04 to .0005. How can I do it? The only option I found is to use write.matrix but then I cant add rownames. Thank you Ronen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Jan 08
1
query
Hello! I found the ccf function gives different estimates than the simple lag correlations. Why is that? This is my code: set.seed(20) x<-rnorm(20) y<-x+rnorm(20,sd=0.3) print("R CCF:") print(ccf(x,y,lag.max=2,plot=F)) myccf<- c( cor(y[-(1:2)],x[-(19:20)]) , cor(y[-1],x[-20]), cor(y,x), cor(x[-1],y[-20]),cor(x[-(1:2)],y[-(19:20)]) )
2007 Jul 19
1
R
Hello! I am using for logistic regression in survey data the svyglm procedure. I wondered how does the strata effect estimates SE (in addition to the weights given proportional to population size). I know that for simple regression measurements of each strata is assumed to have different variance. But in a logistic model this is not the case. Can anyone help me here? Thank you Ron [[alternative
2010 Nov 14
1
Drakensang (German demo): Invisible humans
Hi! I've got a problem running "Drakensang - Am Fluss der Zeit" (German demo, downloaded today): People are not visible. Their shadows and objects they handle are there, however. Surroundings are complete, too (or so it seems to me). I'm on Ubuntu 10.10 (32bit), ATI Radeon HD 5750. I've just compiled Wine 1.3.7 and executed Code: win...
2007 Aug 07
0
help on glmmML
Hello! I am using glmmML for a logitic regression with random effect. I use the posterior.mode as an estimate for the random effects. These can be very different from the estimates obtained using SAS , NLMIXED in the random with out= option. (all the fixed and standard error of random effect estimators are almost identical) Can someone explain to me why is that. The codes I use: R:
2007 Aug 12
0
question on glmmML compared to NLMIXED
Hello! Can anyone help me. I am using the posterior.mode from the result of glmmML. It apears to be different from the BLUe estimate of the RANDOM statement in PROC NLMIXED in SAS. Why is that? Thank you Ronen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]