Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "flush_pwrit".
Did you mean:
flush_pwrite
2020 Mar 17
0
[nbdkit PATCH 4/4] RFC tests: Add test to cover unusual .can_flush return
...tic int64_t
+flush_get_size (void *handle)
+{
+ return 1024*1024;
+}
+
+#define THREAD_MODEL NBDKIT_THREAD_MODEL_PARALLEL
+
+static int
+flush_pread (void *handle, void *buf, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset,
+ uint32_t flags)
+{
+ memset (buf, 0, count);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+flush_pwrite (void *handle, const void *buf, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset,
+ uint32_t flags)
+{
+ if (flags & NBDKIT_FLAG_FUA)
+ nbdkit_debug ("handling native FUA");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+flush_flush (void *handle, uint32_t flags)
+{
+ nbdkit_debug ("handling f...
2020 Mar 17
9
[nbdkit PATCH 0/4] Fix testsuite hang with nbd-stadalone
Either patch 1 or patch 2 in isolation is sufficient to fix the
problem that Rich forwarded on from an archlinux tester (name so I can
credit them?). But both patches should be applied, as well as
backported to appropriate stable branches, to maximize cross-version
interoperability of nbdkit vs. plugins. Patch 3 will let us detect
future similar bugs much faster. I want patch 4 to ensure that