search for: flowids

Hello all, I''ve got a couple redundant (Spanning Tree Protocol) boxes running FC1 minimal install + bridge-utils and they are working great for QoS + ntop monitoring. I''m wondering if I should handle the VoIP traffic a little differently. I don''t mind letting VoIP and Video lend out traffic when it isn''t being used, so that''s why I gave them such

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived

Dear all, I want to make a filter for all IRC-Dalnet traffic, so I want to put all traffic for port 6660, 6661, 6662, 6663, 6664, 6665, 6666, 6667, 6668, 6669, 7000, 7001, 7002, and 8000 to a class. So, I create a TC script as below. I''m sure, it is not effective, and we can write it in simpler. I need help, how to make my script below are simpler. The simpler, the better. Thank you

I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off. Andrew Athan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All: It seems that

Good day all So at log last I did my script We have a 256kbite connection.This scrip runs on my gateway box(the same for script for eth1(ext) and eth0(int) I want to limit all other traffic to 10kbites but when I do it I give me this error: HTB quantum of class 10034 is to small.consider r2q <7>htb*g j=42801780 Here is my script.If you have any Idea to better it let me know.Its a bit from

Hi list, I''m playing with tc and found a strange behavior when I try to delete filters. For example, this simple scenario: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 100 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 128Kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 258Kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:100 htb rate 32Kbit tc filter add dev eth1 parent

Hello all, I am trying to make a filter into my QoS rules and I founded that when I try to use filters u32 and with fwmark they do not work together. This is the filter I use, just and example, for u32: $TC filter add dev $DL parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport 22 0xffff flowid 1:10 This is working fine. Now if I try to mark a package that I want it to go to the same

Hello, I''m trying to shape traffic by IP addresses and by 802.1q vlans. But when I add 802.1q filter filters output looks strange. Maybe I''m missing some options to TC? Thanks, Mindaugas # ./bin/tc -s -d filter show dev eth0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh

tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: prio bands 6 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:1 handle 20: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:2 handle 30: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:3 handle 40: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:4 handle 50: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:5 handle 60: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:6 handle 70: bfifo # www traffic

Hi All I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working the way I want to (or I the way think it should). Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc) Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc) main class = imq0 1:1 sub1 = 1:ffff (default) sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp) sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )

Hi. I''m newie using LARTC. I have some pc''s and one 512/192kbits conection. I do not want that one PC uses all the bandwidth available. I made this script to limit, but I need that the applications (web browsing, messenger with cam and audo , p2p, etc) in pc''s continue acceding normally Internet. Would work this script? what type of qdisc could be added to htb in

Hi to everybody I''m trying to use PRIO qdisc to prioritize the traffic but i have strange problem maybe I''m missing sometging. First i add root qdisc like this tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio it''s fine after this i try to match traffic by tos field but i get error invalid match tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip tos 0x10 0xff

Hi, I''ve failed miserably in my endeavours so far and I''m at the point where help would be much appreciated. I want to have 3 bandwidth limited classes on my Internet interface. In each of those classes I want 3 prioritization bands, and then use "tc filters" to place the traffic into the correct class and priority. The problem is that the traffic

Hi How can I control which filter a packet will meet first? I have tried changing the order of applying the tc filter scripts and switching flowid number, but ''protocol ip u32 match ip src <ip net> match ip src 0.0.0.0/0'' always kicks in first? >From my script -------------------- # All traffic - Priority: Low tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32

Le 26 juil. 07 à 13:55, Georgi Alexandrov a écrit : > Vincent Dautremont wrote: > >> Hi, >> here I have another newcomer question :-) >> in the section 9.6.1 of this how too >> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.qdisc.filters.html >> we can read commands about filters : >> ------------------------------------------ >> >> # tc

Hello, I have wrote some scripts to shape about 1000 workstations. My config: Pentium IV - 2GHz, 1Gb RAM, RedHat Enterprise Advanced Server 3, kernel 2.4.21-9.EL, iproute-2.4.7-11.30E.1 2 Gigabit Lan cards in bridge mode. I use htb. Everything work fine, but I have troubles with showing running configuration. # Init shaper root for dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: htb default 200

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

Hello all, As I have promised I am sending my QoS rules. This now works fine with u32 classifier (and parent 1:0 that I could not understand why it did not worked well before). Att, Nataniel Klug ------------------------ #!/bin/sh #------ # Script de QoS Cyber Nett #------ # Nataniel Klug # suporte@cnett.com.br #------ TC="/sbin/tc" IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables"

Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic on the network doesn''t sink all of the

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure