search for: floodgates

Starting maybe ~ 12 hours ago, the proverbial floodgates were thrown open on emails sent to the CentOS-announce mailing list for CentOS 5.x, all on account of individual package releases. RedHat have not done the same. What's up? Are these mistakenly released re-announcements of (previously released) package updates? Or, did the mailman server ha...

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind After #437891, I got yet another new "unexpected RCODE", this time "NOTIMP". As I was starting to get pissed off, I copied the whole list out of lib/dns/result.c, in an attempt to put an end to my headache. If you insist on using an enumeration instead of ".*",

Dear list members, I have a statistical question, that doesn't belong to this list, and I apologise for that in advance but I would appreciate your help very much. Is there some convention for selecting the a level for significance testing in scientific (e.g. chemical processes) studies? Most people use the 0.05 level but I could not find a reference to justify this. Why not 0.01 or 0.1?

...staff!) but the issues seemed to be software-based. Grandstream also had a little "half-an-ATA186" product as a single-line converter, but I don't have details on that one. It was also $75, which seems to be getting closer to the magic $49.99 price that will open the Radio Shack floodgates. JT > > > Wow, at $75 per phone it is most definitely in the pricerange I'd like >> > :) Who is your contact ? If they work I'd love to get a few... >> >> Not only that, but Grandstream is a vendor who *knows* what Asterisk is >> and cares about th...

Hello all, I'm a newbee and i'd like to test some analog modems i have before purchasing any new hardware. I'm using: - Pentium 500 MHz - Several 56K and 33.6K analog modems (internal and external). - ISDN BRI 1 port card. - A LAN i've successfully tested some SIP sofphones. - An ordinary telephon line (and an ordinary phone :) ). I only modified

> I dont have a concrete design right now and I am happy to take any other ideas Three ideas come to mind, none of which are perfect: 1) I'm tempted to say that now that we have token type, landingpad should generally produce a token, the pointer should be extracted with the @llvm.eh.exceptionpointer intrinsic instead of an extractvalue, and the selector should likewise be extracted with

It seems a little backwards to me to check the landingpad's type as the first check, since the personality dictates the landingpad's type. That said, yes I see how #4 is expedient in allowing personalities using the two main types to lump themselves into EHPersonality::Unknown. As for supporting selector and exception pointer extraction for landingpad of token type, I think you'll

Hi all, just after sending a message to sunmanagers I realized that my question should rather have gone here. So sunmanagers please excus ethe double post: I have inherited a X4140 (8 SAS slots) and have just setup the system with Solaris 10 09. I first setup the system on a mirrored pool over the first two disks pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME

> On Dec 1, 2015, at 11:14 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote: > > While we support 'opaque' types nested within struct types, they are not exactly battle tested: > > $ cat t.ll > %opaque_ty = type opaque > > %struct_ty = type { i32, %opaque_ty } > > define %struct_ty @f(%struct_ty* %p) { > %load = load %struct_ty,

Hi Folks, I have a snv_105 sxce host that I just can''t get to work as expected with crossbow + zones. My test host persephone, is a virtual machine running under VMware ESXi 3.5, with 2 virtual network cards (e1000), all on the same flat network/subnet. It started life just 2 days ago with a clean install of snv_95, and I LUed to 105 yesterday. To rule out any sharing issue, the first