search for: float_varg

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "float_varg".

2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...gleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-11-29-LongSwitch SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-29-SimpleIndirectCall SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-07-Compare64BitConstant SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-04-25-weak SingleSource/UnitTes...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ce/UnitTests/FloatPrecision | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-LoadShorts | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/DefaultInitDynArrays | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-12-StructureArgs | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Threads/tls | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Threads/2010-12-08-tls...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem | 0.0039 696 0.0035 * 0.0033 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | 0.0015 600 0.0025 * 0.0022 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore | 0.0057 656 0.0027 * 0.0025...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem | 0.0040 696 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | 0.0000 600 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore | 0.0120 428 0.0040 * 0.0040...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem | 0.0034 688 0.0014 * 0.0065 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | 0.0025 592 0.0074 * 0.0018 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore | 0.0087 440 0.0011 * 0.0011...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem | 0.0019 716 0.0015 * 0.0015 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg | 0.0007 624 0.0012 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore | 0.0030 676 0.0012 * 0.0011...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem                                 | > 0.0100 672      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg                             | > 0.0000 660      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.01    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore                     | > 0.0100 480      0.0000      *            ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04- > DivRem | 0.0100 672 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01- > float_varg | 0.0000 660 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04- > DynAllocAndRestore | 0.0100 480 0.0000 &gt...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...618 2005-07-17-INT-To-FP.ll 1 5565 0 0.01 5556 0 0.01 5556 2005-11-29-LongSwitch.ll 2 2562 0 0.01 2553 0 0.01 2553 2006-01-23-UnionInit.ll 4 15468 0 0.01 15459 0 0.01 15459 2006-01-29-SimpleIndirectCall.ll 3 2514 0 0.01 2505 0 0.01 2505 2006-02-04-DivRem.ll 2 3113 0 0.01 3104 0 0.01 3104 2006-12-01-float_varg.ll 1 1864 0 0.01 1855 0 0.01 1855 2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore.ll 5 7012 0 0.01 7001 0 0.01 7001 2006-12-07-Compare64BitConstant.ll 1 2532 0 0.01 2523 0 0.01 2523 2006-12-11-LoadConstants.ll 155 38553 0 0.02 38544 0 0.01 38544 2007-01-04-KNR-Args.ll 3 5681 0 0.01 5672 0 0.01 5672 2007-03-02-VaCopy...