Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "flinger".
Did you mean:
linger
2008 Mar 10
2
question for aov and kruskal
...a<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3)
b<-c(101,1010,200,300,400, 202, 121, 234, 55,555,66,76,88,34,239, 30, 40, 50,50,60)
z<-data.frame(a, b)
fligner.test(z$b, factor(z$a))
aov(z$b~factor(z$a))->ll
TukeyHSD(ll)
Now from the aov i found that my model is unbalanced, and from the flinger test i found out that the assumption of homogeneity of variances is rejected. Could my Tukey comparison be a valid one under these violations? From what i read the Tukey test is valid only when the model is balanced and when the assumption of homogeneity of variances is not rejected, am i wrong?...
2019 Dec 12
2
Inconsistencies in wilcox.test
>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius
>>>>> on Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:43:36 +0200 writes:
> So I tried adding Infinity support for all cases.
> And it is (as could be expected) more complicated than I thought.
"Of course !" Thank you, Karolis, in any case!
> It is easy to add Inf support for the test. The problems start with conf.int=TRUE.