search for: flexibility

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not

Hi all, I am trying to run a cluster analysis using Sorenson (Bray-Curtis) distance measure with flexible beta linkage method. However, I can't seem to find flexible beta in any of the functions/packages I have looked at. Any help would be appreciated. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...se-ness. One thing that would be great, but that seems to be against some of the testing philosophy (which we don''t quite deeply understand yet, so we can''t come up with kosher alternatives) is the ability to be more flexible with the return values. Presently the only flexibility is to pass a Proc, but even this is going away. Ideally you could be as flexible as passing a block that received the call''s parameters (which the Proc presently doesn''t receive) so arbitrary logic could be used. Knowing that the more specific tests are the better, this fl...

Sub: INTRODUCTION FOR SUPPLY OF SPECIAL CABLES We have pleasure in introducing ourselves as manufacturer's of specialised cables for over two decades catering to the needs of the Fertilizer, Chemical, Petrochemical, Oil & Gas, Steel, Power, Cement, Ceramic, Glass, Paper, Sugar and other industries. The following are some of the cables made by us: ANY CABLE, ANY TIME, ANY QUANTITY

Greetings, I would like to flexibly combine several data frames objects without specifying the exact names of the objects in memory. Should I use indexing to call those objects out of memory? I regularly use indexes to flexibly extract parts of data frames and lists and to read files from my hard drive, but I can't figure out how to do so with stored objects. In my case, all of the data

On 2/25/20 08:17, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo at embeddedor.com> wrote: >> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language >> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare >> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], >> introduced in C99:

Hello, I'm trying to use the vcd package to analyze survey data. Expert judges ranked possible features for product packaging. Seven features were listed, and 19 judges split between 2 cities ranked them. The following code (1) works, but the side-by-side plots for Cities PX, SF are shrunk too much. Stacking PX on top of SF would make for a better plot. (I could switch the order of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2715 Bug ID: 2715 Summary: for more flexibility, please support a comma ',' separated list of patterns to add to/remove from the defaults Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: en...

It looks like the build problems with the flexible array members in Dovecot 1.1 and GCC 2.95 has been raised several times already on this list, but no one mentioned out that autoconf 2.61+ provides a macro to deal with these. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dovecot-1.1.1-flexible-array-member.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size:

Hi, I have a client behind shorewall which has 2 IP: 192.168.8.35 is the real IP and 192.168.8.37 is the virtual IP. I have added DNAT rules into shorewall: DNAT net loc:192.168.8.35 tcp 11008 - 1.2.3.4 DNAT net loc:192.168.8.37 tcp 55000 - 1.2.3.5 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 is virtual IP

...gic in the Lexer. To override this logic the entire default Lexer and Parser needs to be overridden (probably copying most of the existing logic for the rest of the parsing anyway). I would like to find a more easy way to specify what to return as an identifier or separate logic allowing for more flexibility. I developed a tentative patch that adds this flexibility to the current MCAsmLexer infrastructure. I would like to gather opinions on this approach or ideas on other possible approaches to achieve something similar and find out if somebody else finds this kind of concept useful or not. Thanks, M...

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not

Dear R-helpers: I, an entry level R user, wonder how make a 3d scatter plot with both error bars and a flexibly fitted surface. Can anyone eligthen me? Many Thanks in advance. -Sean [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have a dataFrame variable: L1 L2 L3 ... v1 v2 ... 1 2 3 4 ... I want to process subsets of it as defined by combinations of L1-L2-L3. I do it successfully using nested loops: for (i in valuesOfL1 { for (j in valuesOfL2) { for (k in valuesOfL3) { tempData <- subset(dataFrame, (L1 == i & L2 == j & L3 == k, select=c(v1,v2) )) if

Hi, I need a flexible USB passthrough of a USB-device. If the device is turned off by the current switch (230Volt) the VM should start and not claim that the USB device is left. Using: <devices> ? <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='usb'> <source> <vendor id='0x152a'/> <product id='0x8180'/>

...uld also need to be run as # func(data="eg", A="> 1", B="> 0", C=NA) #end Noteably: -the signs* "<" and ">" need to be flexible _and_ optional -the quantities also need to be flexible -column header names i.e, A, B and C don't need flexibility, i.e., can remain fixed * "less than" and "greater than" so google picks up this thread Once again i find just how limited my grasp of R is...Is do.call() the best way to call binary operators like < & > in a function? Is an ifelse statement needed for each column t...

Dear All, I am trying to create a empty structure that I want to fill gradually through the code. I want to use something like rbind to create the basic structure first. I am looking for a possibility to do an rbind where the columns names dont match fully (but the missing columns can be defaulted to either zero or n/a) (my actual data has a lot of columns). Please see the data frames below I

Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE`. Also annotate array `entries` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the `__counted_by` attribute. Flexible array members annotated with

Hello, unfortunately, I don't know a better subject. I would like to be very flexible in how to process my data. Assume the following dataset: par1 <- seq(0,1,length.out = 100) par2 <- seq(1,100) fac1 <- factor(rep(c("group1", "group2"), each = 50)) fac2 <- factor(rep(c("group3", "group4", "group5", "group6"), each =

Hi, I hope this is the right place for a feature request. I'd like to have more flexible AllowUsers/DenyUsers synax. I am in a situation, where I have machines connected to three networks (a private, high speed, a public, and a private vpn) and I'd like to enable root logins only on the private networks. Currently I see no way of doing this, because there is no way to specify a