search for: flatmates

Hi, I appologise for the bad ettiquite of this, but I have tried looking for some HTB examples that would help me, and am having trouble understanding how the tc filters should work, but I can''t figure out why this isn''t working. I''ve written this script, based upon the ultimate traffic shaper at LARTC, to try and shape for me and my 3 housemates. The idea being to

hey guys. I am running a samba server on my machine at home, which has two other machines on it - both running windows, one's mine and one's my flatmates. Since I am running samba on a trusted network (and I do have the hosts allow rule restricting access so that when I connect to the net people can't just start using my samba server), I am wanting to essentially remove the security feature (well, for that reason and the fact that I can't ge...

On Tuesday, 10 July 2001 at 01:26, Nick Ludlam wrote: > Not got to the bottom of it yet, but commenting out both LOG_INFO > lines in thread/thread.c stops it segfaulting. Now I'm back to the old problem > of a 128k stream not being sent fast enough to the clients. you should just be able to increase STACKSIZE in thread/thread.c from 8192 to 65536. The default stack size is too small,

First I''ll confess my sins, then I''ll beg for help. I own a small wireless ISP, and I sell service at three levels, 256kb/s, 384kb/s, and 512kb/s. For about 18 months, I thought I had this bandwidth limiting figured out. I had three HTB classes off the root, one each with the limits above. Since each customer has a single IP address, I used iptables to mark packets

From: "Brendan Cully" <brendan@icecast.org> > On Tuesday, 10 July 2001 at 01:26, Nick Ludlam wrote: > > Not got to the bottom of it yet, but commenting out both LOG_INFO > > lines in thread/thread.c stops it segfaulting. Now I'm back to the old problem > > of a 128k stream not being sent fast enough to the clients. > > you should just be able to

Hi I''m very very new to tc iproute etc and have read the LARTC howto. What I want to do is create some "master" classes of bandwidth limit and below that per ip address which "inherits" from this master class. Example: one queue for 128Kbps other queue for 256Kbps What I want now is that for example in "class" 128Kbps the ip 10.0.0.5, 10.0.0.8 etc. goes

On Tuesday, 10 July 2001 at 03:21, Nick Ludlam wrote: > From: "Brendan Cully" <brendan@icecast.org> > > That handles the segfault, I don't know why the stream wouldn't be > > sent fast enough though... > > Tried with winamp, sonique and freeamp. All exhibit the same problem of > stuttering play, and eventually this drops out of the icecast log: >

<P>folks,<BR><BR>Sorry to disturb you with such a basic question, but I am new to bandwidth control , shaper etc...&nbsp; I tried reading some doc about it, but couldn´t apply them to solve my (following problem):<BR><BR>I have this..<BR><BR>[internet]------[eth0][linux box][eth1]--------[my lan]<BR><BR><BR>ADSL (256k)<BR>eth0:

I can't tell whether this is really serious: http://www.informatik.fh-hamburg.de/~windle_c/Logologie/MP3-Gefahr/MP3-risk.html Some comments please! <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe'

I''m moving to a new place and my new flatmate wants a router because he likes the cleaness of it all in a non geeky way which I can understand. This means it''s going to be hard for me to pursude him to let me run a computer as a router to act as bandwidth cop. But I don''t fancy trying to use ssh, VNC and games while he''s using WindowsUpdate or p2p. So I need

Hi list! I have a LAN server with Gentoo Linux. It''s a Pentium III at 1000 MHz with 256 MB SDRAM. I''ve implemented a QoS solution with HTB and SFQ. Here is the diagram: _______________________________________________________________________ 1:--+----1:1 - [ counter-strike & icmp ] rate=1Mbit; ceil=1Mbit; | prio 0; (u32 filter

...you had, say, 230 users, for example? Or would >>each user merely need to find for himself with his slice? > > > I wrote something about having to many users in my mail too. :-)=20 > And I made clear that this setup is what I do at home and I do not have=20 > (thank god) 230 flatmates. So hopefully there were no=20 > misunderstandings. :-) > > The interesting question is... are the 230 users all active at the same > time. You only need classes for active users. And for that many active > users, you need a lot of bandwidth if each of them wants to be doing VoIP &g...