search for: flashplayer_11_2_202_616_flashplayer

...player.so > Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so > Version: 11.2.202.577 > Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 > > But it is: > > strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616 > FlashPlayer_11_2_202_616_FlashPlayer > LNX 11,2,202,616 > 11.2.202.616 > drm/%s/%s/%s/11.2.202.616%s > > Any ideas? On my 3 CentOS 6.5 systems here (all up-to-date), only one shows '577' whereas 616 is installed and the 577 binary has gone. Strange, I still didn't get how to "fix" this, even if d...

...yer.so > Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so > Version: 11.2.202.577 > Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 > > But it is: > > strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616 > FlashPlayer_11_2_202_616_FlashPlayer > LNX 11,2,202,616 > 11.2.202.616 > drm/%s/%s/%s/11.2.202.616%s > > Any ideas? As far as I can tell Adobe stopped supporting flash on Linux and a deprecated vulnerable version is all that is available. I would highly advice against using the flash plugin. Unfortunately advertisin...

What the heck is wrong with cron? */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /var/www/html/osticket/api/cron.php in /etc/cron.d doesn't get executed at all (ran from console works of course!). But the SAME file in /tmp runs flawlessly: */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /tmp/cron.php It's CentOS7 on VPS with no SELinux. I've noticed similiar behavior before (on bare metal server with

...About Plugins tells me: Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577 Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 But it is: strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616 FlashPlayer_11_2_202_616_FlashPlayer LNX 11,2,202,616 11.2.202.616 drm/%s/%s/%s/11.2.202.616%s Any ideas? Sincerely Andy

.../usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577 >> Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) Shockwave >> Flash 11.2 r202 >> >> But it is: >> >> strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616 >> FlashPlayer_11_2_202_616_FlashPlayer LNX 11,2,202,616 11.2.202.616 >> drm/%s/%s/%s/11.2.202.616%s >> >> Any ideas? > > As far as I can tell Adobe stopped supporting flash on Linux and a > deprecated vulnerable version is all that is available. No, flash is still supported by Adobe on linux. Only security...

...h-plugin/libflashplayer.so > > Version: 11.2.202.577 > > Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) > > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 > > > > But it is: > > > > strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616 > > FlashPlayer_11_2_202_616_FlashPlayer > > LNX 11,2,202,616 > > 11.2.202.616 > > drm/%s/%s/%s/11.2.202.616%s > > > > Any ideas? > > On my 3 CentOS 6.5 systems here (all up-to-date), only one shows '577' > whereas 616 is installed and the 577 binary has gone. Strange, I still > didn'...

...lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so >> Version: 11.2.202.577 >> Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) >> Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 >> >> But it is: >> >> strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616 >> FlashPlayer_11_2_202_616_FlashPlayer >> LNX 11,2,202,616 >> 11.2.202.616 >> drm/%s/%s/%s/11.2.202.616%s >> >> Any ideas? > > On my 3 CentOS 6.5 systems here (all up-to-date), only one shows '577' > whereas 616 is installed and the 577 binary has gone. Strange, I still > didn't get...