search for: flamethrowing

Dear All, I have installed Red Hat Enterprise 3 on one Intel-32 bit machine. I have installed all systemimager/systeminstaller/flamethrower RPMS that machine. I would like to install OS through PXE boot on another Athlon machine. When I execute mkssimage for creating a image master # mksiimage --Add --name image1 --path /var/lib/systemimager/images/image1 --filename /root/rpmlist

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi, sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. TIA 2006/8/17, l l <happyarch at gmail.com>: > >

Hello all, I'm new on the list and hope this question isn't out of order. I'm booting Xen with mboot.c32 but with 100mb/s cards. I want to upgrade to 1000mb/s. I haven't got the biggest budget to trial and error new network cards so I'd like to buy the right card first time. I think this can be a bit tricky from 100mb/s card experience. A 3c905CX-TXM (03-0247-000 E)

This is the first project I'm taking an active interest in, so I trust that the guiding hand of flamethrowing will teach me the ways. I was anxious to start playing with Vorbis somehow, so I downloaded it via CVS and tried to get the tool in vorbis/cmdline to compile. It didn't compile at all until I made the attached changes. Note that I'm only trying to guess as to how the 'fill_buffer'...

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote: > sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. > Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? > > c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. > > I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. If you want to write a new compiler, you're free to do it in a language of your choice. LLVM is written primarily in

On Friday, the IC3 (FBI/NW3C/BJA) put out a security advisory on their website that contained a fairly vaguely worded warning about Asterisk systems being compromised and then being used as "vishing" (voice phishing) platforms. They were non-specific on the threat other than to advocate upgrading to "newer versions" of Asterisk. This announcement was done on Friday

On 04/05/2011 03:06 PM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:36:21 -0500 > From: Sherwood McGowan<sherwood.mcgowan at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Iptables configuration to handle brute, > force registrations? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at

Hello all at the samba list. The other day there was a migration of server; the old one had Samba 2.2 (.6) working normally. Every user logged in the domain without problems, their SIDs and the domain SID were right, everything was ideal. But a server update was needed, and a new server was installed, also with Samba 2.2 (.12). The difference in version is not important this time as other