search for: flamethrowers

Dear All, I have installed Red Hat Enterprise 3 on one Intel-32 bit machine. I have installed all systemimager/systeminstaller/flamethrower RPMS that machine. I would like to install OS through PXE boot on another Athlon machine. When I execute mkssimage for creating a image master # mksiimage --Add --name image1 --path /var/lib/systemimager/images/image1 --filename /root/rpmlist

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi, sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. TIA 2006/8/17, l l <happyarch at gmail.com>: > >

Hello all, I'm new on the list and hope this question isn't out of order. I'm booting Xen with mboot.c32 but with 100mb/s cards. I want to upgrade to 1000mb/s. I haven't got the biggest budget to trial and error new network cards so I'd like to buy the right card first time. I think this can be a bit tricky from 100mb/s card experience. A 3c905CX-TXM (03-0247-000 E)

This is the first project I'm taking an active interest in, so I trust that the guiding hand of flamethrowing will teach me the ways. I was anxious to start playing with Vorbis somehow, so I downloaded it via CVS and tried to get the tool in vorbis/cmdline to compile. It didn't compile at all until I made the attached changes. Note that I'm only trying to guess as to how the

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote: > sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. > Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? > > c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. > > I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. If you want to write a new compiler, you're free to do it in a language of your choice. LLVM is written primarily in

...ents" sections of any blogs you see linking to this story, or put your own $.02 in as you see fit. We'd like to keep good relations with the IC3 and FBI, and we understand how this kind of mistake can happen (even though we're uncomfortable with the results) so please set your flamethrowers on "warm" instead of "scorch" if you choose to weigh in on the topic yourself. If anyone has questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me via email or phone to discuss. JT --- John Todd jtodd at digium.com +1-256-428-6083 Asterisk Open Source Co...

On 04/05/2011 03:06 PM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:36:21 -0500 > From: Sherwood McGowan<sherwood.mcgowan at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Iptables configuration to handle brute, > force registrations? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at

Hello all at the samba list. The other day there was a migration of server; the old one had Samba 2.2 (.6) working normally. Every user logged in the domain without problems, their SIDs and the domain SID were right, everything was ideal. But a server update was needed, and a new server was installed, also with Samba 2.2 (.12). The difference in version is not important this time as other