Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "flako".
Did you mean:
flaky
2011 Jul 13
6
gplpv driver correctly supports 9GB RAM in Windows 32bit?
Hello
I have Debian Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 Xen 4.0.1, 2 SAS drives in
RAID 1, 16GB ram.
I have virtualized Windows 2003R2 32bit where you install the
latest version 0.11.0.295 gplpv
After reading and reading forums and post testing, I noticed that the
hard disk performance drops significantly when I assign the windows
domU 9GB ram. (below I leave the config files)
If I run the
2012 Dec 27
14
Is it possible to do a dual-boot?
Dear all,
Actually, I want to create my own test-bed based on xen hypervisor with
centos prefered.
However, all I have is one desktop (with a good hardware performance).
So it possible to have a dual-boot (a linux for daily use and the other for
the test-bed) ?
Regards
--
Jihed M’SELMI
http://about.me/jihed.mselmi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
2012 May 04
3
as the Multiple LockWindowUpdate fix?
Hello
I'm running "Oracle Report Developer 6.1" and "From Oracle Developer 6.1" in wine-1.1.28 (very old, but now I can not change version)
When you run the application I notice a delay in drawing the screens, menus, from the debugger I can see the error "fixme: win: LockWindowUpdate (0x10046), partial stub!" repeatedly.
This has solution from the configuration
2012 Oct 19
6
"Boot loader did not return any data" to make HVM to PV
Hello
I''m trying to convert a HVM to PV dom0. The domU is a 10SP2 SLED (
Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21 i386) and is a SLES11SP2 dom0 (Kernel
3.0.13-0.27-xen 64bit).
The truth is that every tutorial I see it differently and I do not
know where this error.
When I start the domU, pvgrub shows the options but when I select the
kenel-xen, returns the error "Boot loader did not return any
2011 Jun 30
1
LOAD GNU/LINUX DEBIAN SYSTEM FROM ISO IMAGE.BUT NOT INSTALL
Good Evening in Spain,
have one question about XEN application I have old server GNU/Linux Debian
with next disc configuration:
/dev/hda1 ext3 8,9G 4,6G 3,9G 55% /
tmpfs tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs 10M 668K 9,4M 7% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/hdb1 ext4 19G 7,7G 9,8G 44% /home
And I want
2014 Sep 02
0
10MiB/s is normal tap:aio:file.raw ?
Hi there
I am analyzing disk performance. I'm testing raw (tap: aio) and lvm (phy :).
The tests I'm doing on a SLES11SP3, cpu I7, 4GBRam, disco-SATAII 7200rpm.
With phy: lvm achievement 70-80MiB / s (an acceptable value)
With tap: aio: file.raw achievement 5-9MiB / s, which is very low ...
10MiB / s is what you should expect access to a tap: aio: file.raw? or I
have something