Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "flagset".
2018 Dec 04
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Supported Optimizations attribute
...rkable scenarios are:
(A) The brittle optimization's invariant is "impossible to [break] for
standard semantic/structural reasons." Therefore no transform ever needs to
know anything about it. The result is a "robust" optimization, and no need
for the supported-optimizations flagset.
(B) The brittle optimization's invariant is, in fact, brittle. Any
transform that doesn't explicitly preserve the invariant *can and will*
break the invariant. Therefore, every transform must have its own whitelist
of "invariants I know I don't break." Any flag in the
support...
2020 Aug 03
3
How to access mailbox metadata in Lua push driver
Some answers to my questions, a first version of my script and more
questions ;)
Am 03.08.20 um 18:15 schrieb Ralf Becker:
> Currently looking into the following questions:
>
> - can I get the rfc 5423 type of event somehow (obviously I can set it
> on the event myself depending of the function called)
event.name
> - looking at the example code, it looks like it can be called for
2018 Dec 04
4
RFC: Supported Optimizations attribute
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:49 PM John McCall <jmccall at apple.com> wrote:
> Piotr's proposal unfortunately doesn't give us a good name for the class
> of optimizations that require being listed in supported_optimizations.
> In earlier discussions I called them "brittle", but I can understand why
> nobody wants to call their optimization that, so let's call
2013 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] RE : Is there any llvm neon intrinsic that maps to vmla.f32 instruction ?
Hi Lang & Renato,
I eventually set up a panda board with latest linaro delivery (eabi-hf). I did some experiments using my own compiler and LLVM 3.2 as back-end.
I use same flagset for my compiler (front-end) and just invoke llc with and without vmlx-forwarding attribute. So base arguments to llc are:
llc -march=arm -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mattr=+neon -float-abi=hard
to which I added -mattr=-vmlx-forwarding to disable vmlx forwarding for cortex-a9.
When I DISABLE vmlx forwarding...
2013 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] RE : Is there any llvm neon intrinsic that maps to vmla.f32 instruction ?
Hi Sebastien,
How many extra vmlas did you see in 433.milc due to disabling
-vmlx-forwarding?
As I mentioned earlier, I saw only two additional integer vmlx instructions
when I tested.
Could you send me your 433.milc compile setup? (os, flags, compiler
version, etc.). I'd like to try to reproduce your results.
Cheers,
Lang.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
2013 Feb 12
3
[LLVMdev] RE : Is there any llvm neon intrinsic that maps to vmla.f32 instruction ?
On 12 February 2013 16:56, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com>wrote:
> If this helps taking your decision, there are at least two benchmarks for
> which disabling vmlx-forwarding makes a significant difference.
>
I think Evan's worry was to base this decision on visible and
comprehensible benchmarks, such as the test-suite.
If I get lucky I may be able to run