Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "flag_pic".
2007 Aug 29
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: Patch for Exceptions
...mmand line, do so now. This is mainly for debugging
[bwendling:llvm-eh] svn diff gcc/config/linux.h
Index: gcc/config/linux.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/linux.h (revision 41554)
+++ gcc/config/linux.h (working copy)
@@ -113,8 +113,9 @@
if (flag_pic) \
argvec.push_back ("--relocation-model=pic"); \
else \
- argvec.push_back ("--relocation-model=static");
-
+ argvec.push_back ("--relocation-model=static"); \
+ if...
2009 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
>>
>> If any ARM/GCC experts know how to fix arm.md to not refer to
>> Darwin-specific macros, that would be great, too.
>
> Probably the right general idea is to #define MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P
> to be 0 for non-Darwin targets. Not sure where to put this so it
> will work for both targets (the Darwin definition comes from config/
> darwin.h).
I don't
2009 Mar 12
2
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
On Mar 12, 2009, at 8:30 AMPDT, Misha Brukman wrote:
>
> ../../../../src/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:4788:
> error: ‘MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P’ undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> This tells me there are some Darwin-specific bits in arm.md which
> shouldn't be there (MachO is Mac OS X-specific). I'm using the
> attached script
2010 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] -fomit-frame-pointer on intel darwin
Can anyone shed some light on the origins of the comments...
/* Mach-O doesn't support omitting the frame pointer for now. */
...in gcc/config/i386/i386.c. FSF gcc trunk has enabled the
omit-frame-pointer option as the default for both i386 and x86_64
recently.
* config.gcc: Handle --enable-frame-pointer.
* configure.ac: Add --enable-frame-pointer.
* configure: Regenerated.
*