search for: flag_mod_add

...Yes, I know, but it shouldn't! Ok, what other schema contains the following attributes: uidNumber unixHomeDirectory loginShell gidNumber ? > I believe it is this line in samdb.py that adds it: > ldbmessage2["objectClass"] = ldb.MessageElement('posixAccount', > ldb.FLAG_MOD_ADD, 'objectClass') > If I knew how to format a patch, I would propose its removal, because > A) I think it shouldn't be there > B) I know it works without it > Also, the classicupgrade shouldn't add the posix objectclasses either. > Why shouldn't you add the posix...

El 09/04/15 a les 18:31, Rowland Penny ha escrit: > > If your tools rely on the posix objectclasses being there, then they are > broken. The posix objectclasses are auxiliaries of other AD > objectclasses and as such, no windows tools will add them. but, e.g., samba-tool with --uid will: luca at ubutest:~$ sudo samba-tool user add tararo tarari --use-username-as-cn

...what other schema contains the following attributes: > uidNumber > unixHomeDirectory > loginShell > gidNumber > ? > >> I believe it is this line in samdb.py that adds it: >> ldbmessage2["objectClass"] = ldb.MessageElement('posixAccount', >> ldb.FLAG_MOD_ADD, 'objectClass') >> If I knew how to format a patch, I would propose its removal, because >> A) I think it shouldn't be there >> B) I know it works without it >> Also, the classicupgrade shouldn't add the posix objectclasses either. >> Why shouldn't...

...f other AD >> objectclasses and as such, no windows tools will add them. > but, e.g., samba-tool with --uid will: Yes, I know, but it shouldn't! I believe it is this line in samdb.py that adds it: ldbmessage2["objectClass"] = ldb.MessageElement('posixAccount', ldb.FLAG_MOD_ADD, 'objectClass') If I knew how to format a patch, I would propose its removal, because A) I think it shouldn't be there B) I know it works without it Also, the classicupgrade shouldn't add the posix objectclasses either. Why shouldn't you add the posix objectclasses ? Well con...