Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "flac_index32".
Did you mean:
flac_index
2007 Sep 03
1
FLAC_index
Hi,
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> I guess the use of unsigned index variables was an accident. Changing
> them back to int makes FLAC pass the "thorough" test suite on amd64.
I was wondering why there isn't a FLAC_index (FLAC_index16 or FLAC_index32)
type that would prevent someone from just "winging" it with a bad choice for
an index to an array?
Chris Arena
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20070903/0ea5dee0/attachment.htm