search for: fizzing

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "fizzing".

Did you mean: fizzling
2013 Nov 01
7
[PATCH] construct listener_fds Hash in 1.8 compatible way
This renables the ability for Ruby 1.8 environments to perform reexecs --- lib/unicorn/http_server.rb | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb b/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb index 2decd77..9a5795c 100644 --- a/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb +++ b/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb @@ -449,13 +449,14 @@ class Unicorn::HttpServer end
2018 May 29
2
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
[Resending due to accidental markdown rendering - sorry] Hi list, Let's talk about adding a new type of debug info metadata. Here are the steps (at minimum - probably incomplete) one needs to take: 1. Create a new class in the hierarchy 2. Implement two forms of `MD_NODE_GET` 3. Specialize `MDNodeKeyImpl` 4. Modify `LLParser.cpp` and add serialization code for your special type5. Modify
2018 May 29
0
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
+some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in) Visitor seems plausible though I haven't looked at the code in detail to see if it'd work perfectly. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:56 AM Sohail Somani (Fizz Buzz Inc.) via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > [Resending due to
2018 May 29
2
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in) > > Visitor seems plausible though I haven't looked at the code in detail to see if it'd work perfectly. > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:56
2018 Jul 16
3
sizeof(DIFlags)
Hi list, Is there a standards based reason why the DIFlags enum is set to uint32_t[1]? I am sure my DWARF-std-reading-fu is not up to snuff and so I cannot seem to find it. The reason I ask is that we are running out of space for our own DIFlags and would like to nail this down before deciding on an approach. Thanks! Sohail [1] The code in question:
2018 May 29
0
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:55, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in) >>
2018 May 29
2
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
Thanks all for your response. On Tue, May 29, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: > > >> On May 29, 2018, at 12:55, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an
2018 May 29
0
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
> On May 29, 2018, at 15:33, Sohail Somani (Fizz Buzz Inc.) <sohail at fizzbuzzinc.com> wrote: > > Thanks all for your response. > > On Tue, May 29, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >> >> >>> On May 29, 2018, at 12:55, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On May 29,
2019 Jul 27
3
[PATCH libnbd] lib: Use symbol versions.
This patch adds support for symbol versions. It is based on what libvirt does. The generated syms file looks like: LIBNBD_1.0 { global: nbd_...; nbd_...; local: *; }; In a future stable 1.2 release, new symbols would go into a new section which would look like this: LIBNBD_1.2 { global: nbd_new_symbol; nbd_another_new_symbol; local: *; } LIBNBD_1.0; In my testing the
2018 Nov 01
2
RFC: Adding debug information to LLVM to support Fortran
Regarding flags, I was just thinking that maybe we should invent a new DISubprogramFlags type. DISubprogram already has a few bitfields for subprogram-specific things, Fortran will want 3 more, and there's no reason to fill up the generic DIFlags with more bits that are used in only one class. I agree that the array stuff needs to be designed with an eye to handling how other languages do
2007 Feb 20
0
Tipping Point IPS blocking Asterisk SIP quaility messages
Hi guys, Just wanted to give you a heads up, so you don't end up chasing strange issues... Since early this morning, our Tipping Point IPS is blocking the Asterisk generated SIP Quality messages (the ones which tell you how good or badly reachably a remote SIP server is) Rule 5051: SIP: PROTOS Test Suite INVITE Test Case This filter detects a test case from the PROTOS SIP testing
2018 May 29
0
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified?
Hi list, Let’s talk about adding a new type of debug info metadata. Here are the steps (at minimum - probably incomplete) one needs to take: 1. Create a new class in the hierarchy 2. Implement two forms of MD_NODE_GET 3. Specialize MDNodeKeyImpl 4. Modify LLParser.cpp and add serialization code for your special type 5. Modify AsmWriter.cpp and add serialization code for your special
2019 May 17
5
Give update.formula() an option not to simplify or reorder the result -- request for comments
Dear All, Martin Maechler has asked me to send this to R-devel for discussion after I submitted it as an enhancement request ( https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563). At this time, the update.formula() method always performs a number of transformations on the results, eliminating redundant variables and reordering interactions to be after the main effects. This is not always
2004 Oct 03
2
using broadvoice and vonage hardware with Asterisk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Greetings, I've just about got Asterisk up and running and am wondering the following. Currently, I subscribe to both Vonage and Broadvoice and as such, I've got a Sipura and Cisco ATA186. Although I'm sure this is expressly prohibited somewhere in my service agreements, can I reprogram these devices to access my own asterisk server rather than
2008 May 16
1
trixbox, sangoma a200, dell poweredge 2550 issue
Hi all, I have setup a Dell PowerEdge 2550 with a Sangoma A200 card with 2xFSO and 1XFS modules. The PowerEdge specs are 1 x P3 1133MHz, 512MB RAM. Sangoma A200 has 3 analogue PSTN lines connected. This server is based in Office 1, with 5 users all with a Linksys SPA942 VoIP Handset. There is another Office (Office 2) connected to here using VPN. There are two users in Office 2 with the