search for: fixupneedsrelaxation

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fixupneedsrelaxation".

2016 Feb 27
0
Fwd: X86 assembler cannot jump NEAR?
On Feb 28, 2016 12:08 AM, "Stephen Checkoway" <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 27, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Jun Koi via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The problem is that llvm-mc always compiles "jmp" this as short jump, no matter where the target is. Hence my question. I dont know if there is any way to change this
2016 Feb 27
2
Fwd: X86 assembler cannot jump NEAR?
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Jun Koi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The problem is that llvm-mc always compiles "jmp" this as short jump, no matter where the target is. Hence my question. I dont know if there is any way to change this behavior. Looks like a bug to me so far. It isn't. It's just created some assembly which, when assembled, may
2013 Sep 25
1
[LLVMdev] arm64 / iOS support
...s(const MCSection &Section) const { + SectionKind kind = Section.getKind(); + return kind.isDataRel() || kind.isReadOnlyWithRel() || kind.isMetadata() || + kind.isMergeableConst(); + } + + unsigned int getNumFixupKinds() const { return AArch64::NumTargetFixupKinds; } + + bool fixupNeedsRelaxation(const MCFixup &Fixup, uint64_t Value, + const MCRelaxableFragment *DF, + const MCAsmLayout &Layout) const { + return false; + } + + virtual void processFixupValue(const MCAssembler &Asm, + const M...