Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fitobject".
Did you mean:
jitobject
2009 Jun 30
1
garchFit in fGarch fitted values are all the same
Dear all-
Package /fGarch/ version 2100.78 in R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22)
running on linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7
In trying to fit garch models in above environment. I am getting
"reasonable" fitted coefficients, but the fitObject@fitted are all the
same. This is true even for the help page example:
library(fGarch)
R> X.timeSeries = as.timeSeries(msft.dat)
R> head(
+ garchFit(Open ~ garch(1,1), data =
returns(X.timeSeries),trace=FALSE)@fitted)
2000-09-28 2000-09-29 2000-10-02 2000-10-03 2000-10-04
200...
2010 Mar 23
1
caret package, how can I deal with RFE+SVM wrong message?
...samp="final",number=10),
+ method="svmRadial",tuneLength=5)
Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=0.1
Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=1
Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=10
Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=100
Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=1000
Error in rfeControl$functions$rank(fitObject, .x, y) :
need importance columns for each class
thank you!
--
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/caret-package-how-can-I-deal-with-RFE-SVM-wrong-message-tp1678800p1678800.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2010 Mar 24
0
R-help ordinal regression
...+? ? ? ? ?
> ???method="svmRadial",tuneLength=5)
> Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=0.1
> Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=1
> Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=10
> Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=100
> Fitting: sigma=0.009246713, C=1000
> Error in rfeControl$functions$rank(fitObject, .x, y) :
> ? need importance columns for each class
>
> thank you!
> --
> View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/caret-package-how-can-I-deal-with-RFE-SVM-wrong-message-tp1678800p1678800.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
&g...