search for: fishers

Hi all, I?m fitting GLM?s and I can?t interprete the coefficients when I run a model with interaction terms. When I run the simpliest model there is no problem: Model1<-glm (Fishes ~ Year + I(Year^2) + Kind.Geographic + Kind.Fishers + Zone.2 + Hours + Fishers + Month, family = poisson(log)) # Fishes, Year, Hours, and Fishers are numeric, Kind.Geographic, Kind.Fishers, Zone.2 and Month are factors with 4, 3, 5 and 12 levels respectively. Model1$coefficients (whith Helmert contrasts): (Intercept) Year...

I seem to be able to use expected values that are decimal (e.g., 1.33) when using chisq.test but not when using fisher.test. This happens when using an array/matrix as input. Fisher.test returns: Error in sprintf(gettext(fmt, domain = domain), ...) : invalid format '%d'; use format %s for character objects. Thus, it appears fisher.test is looking for integers only. I tried putting the

Full_Name: Martha Nason Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (137.187.154.154) I am running simulations using fisher's test on 2 x c tables and a very small p.value from fisher's test (<2.2e-16) is returned as a negative number. Code follows. > set.seed(0) > nreps.outer <-7 > pvalue.fisher <- rep(NA,nreps.outer) > > population1 <- c(

In an effort to select the most appropriate number of clusters in a mixture analysis I am comparing the expected and actual membership of individuals in various clusters using the Fisher?s exact test. I aim for the model with the lowest possible p-value, but I frequently get p-values below 2.2e-16 and therefore does not get exact p-values with standard Fisher?s exact tests in R. Does anybody know

Dear friends, My dataset have many zeros, so i must use fisher exact test . Unfortunately, the fisher.test(stats) function fail to do it. Anybody knows how to do the fisher exact test with many zeros in the dataset? My dataset is: a<-matrix(c(0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,2,1,5,1,1,6,4,4,1,17,2,8,5,7,1,1,24,3,6,1,1,3,2,16,7,4,0,2,4,0,17,0,1,0,0,0,1,2),nrow=8,byrow=TRUE) data.frame(a)

The hybrid feature in fisher.test looks to me like an excellent way to analyze my two-way tables. The only problem is that it does not seem to be implemented. Am I right about this? An example is pasted below. I note that I get the warning message only when I shouldn't: for a 2x2 table hybrid seems to be ignored without warning. In no case does fisher.test seem to be checking Cochran

Timothy, I believe you are mistaken. Fisher's exact test give the correct answer even in the face of small expected values for the cell counts. Pearson's Chi-square approximates Fisher's exact test and can give the wrong answer when expected cell counts are low. Chi-square was developed because it is computationally "simple". Fisher's exact test, particularly with tables

I have two vectors (a and b) with counts of animals and wanted to calculate fisher's alpha: library(vegan) a <- c(2043, 1258, 52, 1867, 107, 1624, 2, 157, 210, 402, 5, 107, 267, 2, 13683) b <- c(2043, 1258, 52, 1867, 107, 1624, 2, 157, 210, 402, 5, 107, 267, 2, 3000) fisher.alpha(a) fisher.alpha(b) fisher.alpha(a) gave the following warnings: > fisher.alpha(a) [1] 1.572964

jonathan.fisher at freeradius:~$ sudo net ads join -Uadministrator Enter administrator's password: Using short domain name -- WINDOWS Joined 'FREERADIUS' to dns domain 'windows.corp.XXX.com' jonathan.fisher at freeradius:~$ hostname freeradius jonathan.fisher at freeradius:~$ hostname -d windows.corp.XXX.com jonathan.fisher at freeradius:~$ hostname -f

Suppose we have the following data set: Men Women Dieting 10 30 Non-dieting 5 60 If I run the Fisher exact test in R then what does alternative = greater (or less) imply? For example: mat = matrix(c(10,5,30,60), 2,2) fisher.test(mat,alternative ="greater") I get the p-value = 0.01588 and odds ratio = 3.943534. Also, when I flip the rows of

192.168.127.129 is the core DNS server. It forwards anything in the windows subdomain straight to the DCs, so it doesn't matter if this client is pointed at the DC or the main DNS server. Either way, it still does the wrong behavior, which is use the short .WINDOWS instead of . WINDOWS.CORP.XXX.COM I removed all .tdb files, purged /var/cache/samba, removed /etc/krb5.tdb, and deleted the

Hi to all is there a fisher's post hock test or fisher's combination test in R available? Maybe not -- its very easy to do it in excel ... Kind regards Knut

Is anyone aware of a fast way of doing fisher's exact test for a series of 2 x 2 tables in R? The fisher.test is really slow if n1=1000 and n2 = 1000. -- Thanks, Jim. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, R-help, I have a group of data from RNA-seq want to be analyzed by Fisher's exact test in R. I want to compare the significant difference of about 30,0000 individuals in two different samples, and I have no idea how to use R, so could you please give me some suggestions or the scripts for Fisher's exact test? Thank you very much. Best, Guanfeng Wang [[alternative HTML version

Hi folks, Forgive me if this question is a trivial issue. I was doing a series of Fishers' exact test using the fisher.test function in stats package. Since the counts I have were quite large (c(64, 3070, 2868, 4961135)), R suggested me to use *other algorithms* for the test which can be specified through the 'control' argument of the fisher.test function as I understood. Bu...

I'm using fisher.exact on a 4x2 table and it seems to work. Does anyone know exactly what is going on? I thought fisher.exact is only for 2x2 tables. Note: I can't use chi-squared because I have a couple of cells with 0 and < 5 observations. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/fisher-exact-for-2x2-table-tp3481979p3481979.html Sent from the R help

Hi All. Sorry to bother you. I have a question about fisher exact test. I counted the presence of gene mutation in two groups of samples. My data is as follows Presence Absence GroupA 4 6 GroupB 5 11 When using the formula of fisher exact test provided by wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher%27s_exact_test), the p-value is 0.29. But when

Hi, I want to analyse a contigency table (3 x 12) with a fisher.test beacause there are cells that are less than 5. ?mmen Anken Baf Belchen H?chi Hof Porti R?m Schmutz Sch?n Sissa Tann class14 7 26 150 2 46 68 126 66 3 31 7 61 class24 7 6 55 5 49 71 93 90 1 18 16 79 class34 1 1 4 3 19 8 29 61

Dear All, I have a problem understanding the difference between the outcome of a fisher exact test and a chi-square test (with simulated p.value). For some sample data (see below), fisher reports p=.02337. The normal chi-square test complains about "approximation may be incorrect", because there is a column with cells with very small values. I therefore tried the chi-square with

Hi everyone, I'm trying to solve a problem about how to get the Fisher's discriminant functions of a "lda" (linear discriminant analysis) object, I mean, the object obtained from doing "lda(formula, data)" function of the package MASS in R-project. This object gives me the canonical linear functions (n-1 coefficients matrix of n groups at least), and only with this