search for: fiselier

...like something best worked around inside poly. The builds take place hourly and their output is reported on the www-scripts at lists.llvm.org mailing list. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias.grosser at inf.ethz.ch > wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017, at 08:19 AM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-dev wrote: > > Thanks Tanya, > > > > Unfortunately it seems like `clang-tools-extra` has started failing > > again, > > with the similar error message "make: *** No rule to make target > > `docs-clang-tools-html'. Stop." > > > >...

Ping. It's been another week. When are we going to get the docs building and updating again? On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > Ping. Everything is still broken. > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > >> I don't know if that would make a difference. Whenever a CMake file is >> changed and a build >> rule is execu...

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:39 AM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca <mailto:eric at efcs.ca>> wrote...

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:39 AM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > What would be the status of these buildbots? Is it for your private usage? > > I intend for them to be pub...

On 3/6/2016 1:38 AM, Eric Fiselier wrote: > I recognize these failures, and I think they should be fixed when > building with clang 3.8. IIRC the cause of the errors is that > libc++abi.so linked to the wrong unwinding libraries pre-3.8. I believe > the relevant commit is r255559 (http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255559). >...

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca <mailto:eric at efcs.ca>> wrote:...

What would be the status of these buildbots? Is it for your private usage? Otherwise having “project' bots” using a non-official mirror may sound like a strange situation to me. — Mehdi > On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:04 PM, Eric Fiselier via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Adding cfe-dev list... > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca <mailto:eric at efcs.ca>> wrote: > Hi Will, > > I would like to request collaborator permissions for the Libc++ g...

...ry and starting fresh. On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info > wrote: > What if the script would do cmake --build instead of direct make > invocation? I believe, this would solve the problem, no? > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Eric Fiselier via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Tanya, > > > > The www-scripts builder that updates the Sphinx documentation has been > > broken for about a week now, despite the buildbot builders passing. > > > > The error from the last sphinx...

Hi All, I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using restructured text and not HTML. What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get the required changes made for libcxx.llvm.org? /Eric

Hi Will, I would like to request collaborator permissions for the Libc++ github mirror. I plan to use the access to setup Appveyor buildbots for libc++. In order to do this I need to be listed as a collaborator on Github. The alternative to Github access would be setting up the correct webhooks for llvm.org/git/libcxx.git, but this seems harder to both do and maintain. /Eric --------------

...ture of their choosing and then have that system integrated in a common reporting platform so it is useful and accessible to everyone. Thoughts? -Mike On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at...

...Mar 8, 2019 at 5:46 PM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > The attached patch may help matters, though it now fails because "test2" > doesn't exist (it's not enabled). > > -bw > > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:38 AM Eric Fiselier via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I know we're late in the release process, but I've discovered a >> regression I believe is serious enough to hold the release [1]. >> >> The regression is in usages of `__bui...

CC Tanya and ping. On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. > Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using > restructured text and not HTML. > > What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx b...

Hi All, I recently learned that the RC binaries are built without assertions, the same way the actual releases are built. This seems like a serious bug to me. We should be looking for assertion failures during RC testing, not hiding them. So why are assertions disabled? I suggest we enable assertions in RC binaries right away. /Eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi All, Appveyor is a CI product for Windows. It's free for open source projects on Github. Libc++ has been using it via the llvm-mirror organization on Github [1]. Should we set Appveyor up for the official LLVM Github organization? The motivation for testing libc++ on Windows using Appveyor over Buildbot is that Appveyor allows for a faster development cycle. CI configuration changes are

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 03:58 AM, Eric Fiselier via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi All, > > The bugzilla links of the form `llvm.org/PR*xxxx` *are still redirecting > to > llvm.org/bugs/... instead of `bugs.llvm.org/`. > > Could we fix this? And while at this, maybe also add a redirect for httpS://llvm.org/PR* Best, Tobias >...

Hi Eric, On 20 July 2015 at 10:41, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. > Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using > restructured text and not HTML. > > What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx b...

On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:35 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > Part of me is still concerned with the future, and the filesystems which are yet to exist. > Me too. But it is best to target modern systems when targeting future systems adds an unnecessary cost. When future systems come into being, it is likely bec...

Hi all, I'm working on adding a new buildbot. I'm don't understand what is required when patching zorg's builders.py and slaves.py. Is there any documentation on this? Would anybody be willing to help? Best, Eric Fiselier -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140731/93c86c1a/attachment.html>

On Dec 11, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Eric Fiselier via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So it seems that libatomic went missing between build #1379 and #1380, so I don't think this is related to the -std=c++11 failure. Instead it seems likely that the compile test for -std=c++11 is failing due to mis-configuring -latomic....