Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "firmer".
Did you mean:
farmer
2011 Mar 14
2
[Bug 1878] New: error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
Summary: error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.8p1
Platform: All
URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug
/663455
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Com...
2015 Mar 26
0
[Bug 1878] error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
CC| |jjelen at redhat.com
Resolution|FIXED
2015 Mar 26
0
[Bug 1878] error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> ---
Created attachment 2576
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2576&action=edit
upstream patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
2015 Apr 17
0
[Bug 1878] error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Damien Miller <djm at
2015 Aug 11
0
[Bug 1878] error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release
2015 Mar 26
0
[Bug 1845] Bugs intended to be fixed in 5.9
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1845
Bug 1845 depends on bug 1878, which changed state.
Bug 1878 Summary: error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--...
2015 Apr 17
0
[Bug 1845] Bugs intended to be fixed in 5.9
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1845
Bug 1845 depends on bug 1878, which changed state.
Bug 1878 Summary: error message in key_perm_ok should be firmer
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--...
2003 Jun 24
0
help on R programming.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murad Nayal [mailto:mn216 at columbia.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:02 PM
> Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: [R] help on R programming.
>
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am looking for books to help me gain a firmer grasp on the S/R
> programming language , programing / data structures etc. it
> seems that
> for this purpose two books are typically recommended:
>
> Programming with Data: A Guide to the S Language, John M. Chambers and
> S Programming by Venables & Ripley.
>
> -...
2013 May 15
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r181753 - This is the first of three patches which creates stubs used for
...ilar problems in the ARM
> backend for Thumb/ARM interworking, but I’m not the one maintaining this
> code, so that doesn’t matter quite as much. I would request, however,
> that any follow-up patches that touch target-independent code be held
> for the time being until things come to a firmer resolution.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>>>
>>> On May 13, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler atmips.com
>>> <http://mips.com/>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: rkotler
>>>> Date: Mon May 13 21:00:24 2013
>>>> Ne...
2001 Jul 16
2
Trouble with the memory allocation
Dear R-users,
I am currently facing what appears to be a strange thing (at least to my
humble understanding).
If I understood correctly, starting with the version 1.2.3, R memory
allocation can be done dynamically,
and there is no need to fiddle with the --nsize and --vsize parameter
any longer...
So far this everything seemed to go this way (I saw the size of my
processes growing when I was
2003 Jun 18
3
Multiple graph sheets
In Splus the code
test.lm <- lm(y ~ x, data = test.data)
plot(test.lm)
generates a graphics window that contains
multiple graph sheets that one may choose
from via the "page" tabs at the bottom of
the window.
Is there a way to do this sort of thing in
R? As another example, I have some repeated
measures data with continuous outcomes and
have been working with the nlme library in
2012 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
On May 8, 2012, at 3:02 PM, dag at cray.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As I've mentioned before we are doing some work on the LLVM scheduler to
> improve it. Specifically, we are working to get loads and stores to
> move past each other when possible.
>
> When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I
> got a response about a MachineInstr
2016 Jan 26
3
Just need to vent
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:51:29AM +0000, Peter Duffy wrote:
> I'm also still trying to figure out in what way systemd is supposed to
> be "better". I've seen the following things claimed for it:
Of the three things you list, hot-plug is certainly an important one.
But, it's not the big deal. The big deal is that systemd is not just a
fire-and-hope startup system, but
2012 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
...bout replacing the scheduler. If there
> was I missed it. That's easy to do on a list with hundreds of messages
> a day. It would be helpful to have a roadmap page on the LLVM web site
> to call attention to decisions like this. Such a page could be updated
> as timelines become firmer.
>
>> The actual planning coincided nicely with your RFC, providing a good
>> opportunity to air it on llvm-dev.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "planning." Do you mean design work? I
> think that's quite different from a roadmap with timelines. It...
2012 May 09
5
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
...;t recall any post about replacing the scheduler. If there
was I missed it. That's easy to do on a list with hundreds of messages
a day. It would be helpful to have a roadmap page on the LLVM web site
to call attention to decisions like this. Such a page could be updated
as timelines become firmer.
> The actual planning coincided nicely with your RFC, providing a good
> opportunity to air it on llvm-dev.
I'm not sure what you mean by "planning." Do you mean design work? I
think that's quite different from a roadmap with timelines. It's really
the former that...
2005 May 11
2
AreskiCC Install Problems
I have followed the Idiots' guide for installation, but still could not
make it work.
When I try to login at the web page coming from /var/www/html/areski , I
get the following errors:
Can some body give me some hints where and what to check for this
error?. I am looking for info on the changes we have to make for
1) the database name
2) user name
3) password
4)connection name (server
2012 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
Hi everyone,
As I've mentioned before we are doing some work on the LLVM scheduler to
improve it. Specifically, we are working to get loads and stores to
move past each other when possible.
When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I
got a response about a MachineInstr scheduler and that that was the way
of the LLVM future. Is that so? Is the ScheduleDAG going
2003 Jun 08
2
state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)
...get files. However, commands will be pipelined,
network-independent binary, and using only a single tcp connection. In
general we hope that there will be less special cases, and probably that
there will be less application-level intelligence in the server and more
in the client. This should be a firmer foundation for building things
such as
* implementations in different languages/platforms (Java, Win32
native, INTERCAL, ...)
* interactive rsync (like ftp(1))
* two-way rsync (controlled by the client, which could be automatic
or even have a GUI.)
* rsync as a transport for things su...
2005 Oct 14
10
Active Record: Prepared Statements?
Hello all,
my first project is on it''s way, and I am loving it!
But, and that''s a big BUT:
Active Record does not use prepared statements! How is that? Everybody is
bragging about performance and the most obvious tuning measure is missing.
Ok, I don''t know, if MySQL can even do them as I am using Postgres, but
still.
I started looking at the code and it is not
2008 Nov 21
57
Spec''ing via features
As I work with Rails TestUnit tests I am reconsidering how to use
cucumber features. It seems to me that it might be best to have a
coherent view of how to arrange my test suites before I get much further
into this. Now, so far I have considered three possibilities:
1. Use features exclusively. Create a feature file for each model, one
for each controller and possibly an additional one for