search for: firemeteor

I''ve seen a recent report claiming that it works: http://linux-bsd-sharing.blogspot.pt/2012/10/howto-xen-413-windows-8-hvm-domu-with.html However, in my case, with a slightly different HW configuration the story is totally different. :-（ My config: HW: I7-3770 + AsRock H77M-ITX board Dom0: Debian Wheezy stock xen (v4.1.3) + Debian stock kernel (3.2.x / 3.6.x) 64 bit version. Note that

...is is hvmloader part of the change that gets rid of the resource conflict warning in the guest kernel. The OpRegion may not always be page aligned. As a result one extra page is required to fully accommodate the OpRegion in that case. Just reserve one more page here. Signed-off-by: Timothy Guo <firemeteor@users.sourceforge.net> diff -r 11b4bc743b1f tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c Mon Dec 17 14:59:11 2012 +0000 +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c Thu Dec 20 00:07:40 2012 +0800 @@ -142,11 +142,11 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e nr+...

...e i915 driver probes chip version through PCH ISA bridge device / vendor ID. Previously, the PCH ISA bridge is exposed as PCI-PCI bridge in qemu-xen-trad, which breaks the assumption of the driver. This change fixes the issue by correctly exposing the ISA bridge to domU. Signed-off-by: Rui Guo <firemeteor@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: Rui Guo <firemeteor@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> Xen-devel: http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=135548433715750 Change since last version:...

I was running benchmark on IO performance using iozone3. In my build, the dom0 resides on a small usb stick and all the storage comes from a NFS mount. I test NFS performance on both dom0 && domU, mounting from the same server. The dom0 test works just well, but the domU run suffers from unstable NFS mount. Since this is a NFS root, the domU just appear to be freezed. The log from both

I was running benchmark on IO performance using iozone3. In my build, the dom0 resides on a small usb stick and all the storage comes from a NFS mount. I test NFS performance on both dom0 && domU, mounting from the same server. The dom0 test works just well, but the domU run suffers from unstable NFS mount. Since this is a NFS root, the domU just appear to be freezed. The log from both

Hi developers, I met some domU issues and the log suggests missing interrupt. Details from here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/263938#263938 In summary, this is the suspicious log: (XEN) vmsi.c:122:d32767 Unsupported delivery mode 3 I''ve checked the code in question and found that mode 3 is an ''reserved_1'' mode. I want to trace down the source of this

This series contains all the fixes required to produce a working IGD passthrough box. All the changes are previously seen in the dev list but not yet accepted. Some of them are out-dated and need some reshape. Detailed description can be found later in each patch. . [PATCH 1/3] qemu-xen-trad/pt_msi_disable: do not clear all MSI flags . [PATCH 2/3] qemu-xen-trad: Correctly expose PCH ISA bridge

Package: xen-utils-4.1 Version: 4.1.3-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The xen 4.1.3 release misses this 4.2 patch mentioned in this thread: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-06/msg01909.html As a result, MSI delivery does not work properly for PVHVM guest. In my case, PCI devices passthroughed from host does not work properly, the guest kernel complains about missing

Hi guys, I''m running a freenas domU (FreeBSD 8.3 based, ZFS v28, 2 vcpus mapped to the same HT capable core) to serve storage for all purpose including other domUs running on the same host. I did some study to understand how well it works and the result is kind of confusing. In summary, the network performance between domains on the same host is worse than expected. And NFS service to

Hi, list, A VMM provides a VMCS for each VM. How does the VMM assign system resources for each VM? For example, in a multi-core environment, how can I enable the VMM to run, say, on a two-core intel''s processor while I am able to force a VM to execute only on a specific core upon initializing the Guest OS ? that is to say, how I can assure the VM to believe that there is only one physical

...ail.com> Roy Franz <roy.franz@linaro.org> Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl> Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com> Ruan Zhijie <ruanzhijie@hotmail.com> Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Ruchika Kharwar <ruchika@ti.com> Rui Guo <firemeteor@users.sourceforge.net> Rui li <li.rui27@zte.com.cn> Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com> Runzhen Wang <runzhen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Rupesh Gujare <rgujare@ozmodevices.com> Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@atmel.com> Rupesh Kumar <rupesh.kumar@stericsson.com>...

...ail.com> Roy Franz <roy.franz@linaro.org> Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl> Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com> Ruan Zhijie <ruanzhijie@hotmail.com> Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Ruchika Kharwar <ruchika@ti.com> Rui Guo <firemeteor@users.sourceforge.net> Rui li <li.rui27@zte.com.cn> Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com> Runzhen Wang <runzhen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Rupesh Gujare <rgujare@ozmodevices.com> Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@atmel.com> Rupesh Kumar <rupesh.kumar@stericsson.com>...