Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "firebed".
Did you mean:
firebee
2017 May 31
1
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
On 5/31/2017 12:46 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Not dealing with "secret", dealing with HIPAA and PII data. And*sigh*
> Homeland Security Theater dictates....
We run all used disks through a shredder before surplusing any systems,
and we are just a manufacturing company dealing with internal corporate
IT stuff. the shredder is a truck from a 'data destruction'
2017 May 31
0
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
...verted into the grey market. each drive goes into the shredder
> and comes out as metal filings.
>
Not relevant to this particular instance, but for domestic disks I keep
them (along with old credit cards, memory sticks etc) until I have the
garden incinerator going. With a good bright red firebed the disks
don't last long - some run out of the bottom as liquid aluminium. I'm
pretty certain even MI5/NSA won't get much off congealed Al!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 byte...
2016 Feb 09
1
Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
> Behalf Of EGO-II.1
> Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
>
>
>
> >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind
> >> the media up into
2017 May 31
3
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/31/2017 10:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> If I had realized it would run this long, I would have used DBAN.... For
>> single drives, I do, and choose DoD 5220.22-M (seven passes), which is
>> *way* overkill these days... but I sign my name to a certificate that
>> gets stuck on the outside of the server, meaning I, personally, am