search for: finodelk

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 37 matches for "finodelk".

Did you mean: inodelk
2018 Apr 11
2
Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes
...0.00 us 0.00 us 1 > RELEASE > 0.00 18.00 us 18.00 us 18.00 us 1 > STATFS > 0.00 20.50 us 11.00 us 30.00 us 2 > FLUSH > 0.00 22.50 us 17.00 us 28.00 us 2 > FINODELK > 0.01 76.50 us 65.00 us 88.00 us 2 > FXATTROP > 0.01 177.00 us 177.00 us 177.00 us 1 > CREATE > 0.02 56.14 us 23.00 us 128.00 us 7 > LOOKUP > 0.02 259.00 us 20.0...
2018 Apr 12
0
Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes
...1 >> RELEASE >> 0.00 18.00 us 18.00 us 18.00 us 1 >> STATFS >> 0.00 20.50 us 11.00 us 30.00 us 2 >> FLUSH >> 0.00 22.50 us 17.00 us 28.00 us 2 >> FINODELK >> 0.01 76.50 us 65.00 us 88.00 us 2 >> FXATTROP >> 0.01 177.00 us 177.00 us 177.00 us 1 >> CREATE >> 0.02 56.14 us 23.00 us 128.00 us 7 >> LOOKUP >>...
2018 Apr 13
1
Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes
...>>> 0.00 18.00 us 18.00 us 18.00 us 1 >>> STATFS >>> 0.00 20.50 us 11.00 us 30.00 us 2 >>> FLUSH >>> 0.00 22.50 us 17.00 us 28.00 us 2 >>> FINODELK >>> 0.01 76.50 us 65.00 us 88.00 us 2 >>> FXATTROP >>> 0.01 177.00 us 177.00 us 177.00 us 1 >>> CREATE >>> 0.02 56.14 us 23.00 us 128.00 us 7 >>>...
2012 Dec 17
2
Transport endpoint
...hared-client-0-0 [2012-12-15 00:53:24.743459] I [server-helpers.c:474:do_fd_cleanup] 0-RedhawkShared-server: fd cleanup on /mkennedy/tramelot_nwfs/rpr3/rpr3/rpr3_sparky/matrix/.4d_ccnoesy.ucsf.QTQswL [2012-12-15 00:53:24.743430] I [server-helpers.c:330:do_lock_table_cleanup] 0-RedhawkShared-server: finodelk released on /mkennedy/tramelot_nwfs/rpr3/rpr3/rpr3_sparky/matrix/.4d_ccnoesy.ucsf.QTQswL [2012-12-15 00:53:24.743400] I [server-helpers.c:741:server_connection_put] 0-RedhawkShared-server: Shutting down connection mualhpcp01.hpc.muohio.edu-17684-2012/12/13-17:25:16:994209-RedhawkShared-client-0-0 [...
2012 Dec 17
1
stripped volume in 3.4.0qa5 with horrible read performance
...with absurd latency figures. I stopped the node and the problem moved to another brick: %-latency Avg-latency Min-Latency Max-Latency No. of calls Fop --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ---- 99.94 551292.41 us 10.00 us 1996709.00 us 361 FINODELK Could anyone provide some information how to debug this problem? Currently the volume is not usable due to the horrible delay. Thank you very much in advance, Samuel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/glust...
2018 May 30
2
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
...107.00 us 550203.00 us 11840 > FXATTROP > 0.34 14820.49 us 38.00 us 1935527.00 us 444 > STAT > 0.88 3765.77 us 42.00 us 1341978.00 us 4581 > LOOKUP > 15.06 19624.04 us 26.00 us 6412511.00 us 14971 > FINODELK > 21.63 59817.26 us 45.00 us 4008832.00 us 7054 > FSYNC > 23.19 263941.14 us 86.00 us 4130892.00 us 1714 > READ > 38.10 125578.64 us 207.00 us 7682338.00 us 5919 > WRITE > > Duration: 6957 seconds > D...
2017 Sep 05
0
Slow performance of gluster volume
OK my understanding is that with preallocated disks the performance with and without shard will be the same. In any case, please attach the volume profile[1], so we can see what else is slowing things down. -Krutika [1] - https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Monitoring%20Workload/#running-glusterfs-volume-profile-command On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Abi Askushi
2018 May 30
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
...11840 >> FXATTROP >> 0.34 14820.49 us 38.00 us 1935527.00 us 444 >> STAT >> 0.88 3765.77 us 42.00 us 1341978.00 us 4581 >> LOOKUP >> 15.06 19624.04 us 26.00 us 6412511.00 us 14971 >> FINODELK >> 21.63 59817.26 us 45.00 us 4008832.00 us 7054 >> FSYNC >> 23.19 263941.14 us 86.00 us 4130892.00 us 1714 >> READ >> 38.10 125578.64 us 207.00 us 7682338.00 us 5919 >> WRITE >> >>...
2018 May 30
1
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
...ROP >>> 0.34 14820.49 us 38.00 us 1935527.00 us 444 >>> STAT >>> 0.88 3765.77 us 42.00 us 1341978.00 us 4581 >>> LOOKUP >>> 15.06 19624.04 us 26.00 us 6412511.00 us 14971 >>> FINODELK >>> 21.63 59817.26 us 45.00 us 4008832.00 us 7054 >>> FSYNC >>> 23.19 263941.14 us 86.00 us 4130892.00 us 1714 >>> READ >>> 38.10 125578.64 us 207.00 us 7682338.00 us 5919 >>> WR...
2018 Jun 01
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
....34 14820.49 us 38.00 us 1935527.00 us 444 >>>> STAT >>>> 0.88 3765.77 us 42.00 us 1341978.00 us 4581 >>>> LOOKUP >>>> 15.06 19624.04 us 26.00 us 6412511.00 us 14971 >>>> FINODELK >>>> 21.63 59817.26 us 45.00 us 4008832.00 us 7054 >>>> FSYNC >>>> 23.19 263941.14 us 86.00 us 4130892.00 us 1714 >>>> READ >>>> 38.10 125578.64 us 207.00 us 7682338.00 us...
2017 Sep 08
3
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
....0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7fbcad8d09fe] (--> >> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x90)[0x7fbcad8d2170] (--> >> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x2a0)[0x7fbcad8d2c20] ))))) > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) > op(FINODELK(30)) called at 2017-09-08 09:31:45.626882 (xid=0x27ab5) > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382451] E [MSGID: 114031] > [client-rpc-fops.c:1593:client3_3_finodelk_cbk] > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: remote operation failed [Transport endpoint > is not connected] > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382835] E [rp...
2017 Sep 08
1
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
...gfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7fbcad8d09fe] (--> > /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x90)[0x7fbcad8d2170] > (--> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x2a0)[0x7fbcad8d2c20] ))))) > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) > op(FINODELK(30)) called at 2017-09-08 09:31:45.626882 (xid=0x27ab5) > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382451] E [MSGID: 114031] > [client-rpc-fops.c:1593:client3_3_finodelk_cbk] > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: remote operation failed [Transport endpoint > is not connected] > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382835] E [rp...
2018 May 30
1
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
...313379 >> FSTAT >> 0.23 1059.84 us 25.00 us 2716124.00 us 38255 >> LOOKUP >> 0.47 1024.11 us 54.00 us 6197164.00 us 81455 >> FXATTROP >> 1.72 2984.00 us 15.00 us 37098954.00 us 103020 >> FINODELK >> 5.92 44315.32 us 51.00 us 24731536.00 us 23957 >> FSYNC >> 13.27 2399.78 us 25.00 us 22089540.00 us 991005 >> READ >> 37.00 5980.43 us 52.00 us 22099889.00 us 1108976 >> WRITE >> 41....
2017 Sep 08
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
...(-- > /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7fbcad8d09fe] (--> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x90)[0x7fbcad8d2170] (--> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x2a0)[0x7fbcad8d2c20] ))))) 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) op(FINODELK(30)) called at 2017-09-08 09:31:45.626882 (xid=0x27ab5) [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382451] E [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:1593:client3_3_finodelk_cbk] 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: remote operation failed [Transport endpoint is not connected] [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382835] E [rpc-clnt.c:365:saved_frames...
2017 Sep 08
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
....0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7fbcad8d09fe] (--> >> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x90)[0x7fbcad8d2170] (--> >> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x2a0)[0x7fbcad8d2c20] ))))) > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) > op(FINODELK(30)) called at 2017-09-08 09:31:45.626882 (xid=0x27ab5) > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382451] E [MSGID: 114031] > [client-rpc-fops.c:1593:client3_3_finodelk_cbk] > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: remote operation failed [Transport endpoint > is not connected] > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382835] E [rp...
2017 Sep 08
1
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
....0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7fbcad8d09fe] (--> >> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x90)[0x7fbcad8d2170] (--> >> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x2a0)[0x7fbcad8d2c20] ))))) > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) > op(FINODELK(30)) called at 2017-09-08 09:31:45.626882 (xid=0x27ab5) > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382451] E [MSGID: 114031] > [client-rpc-fops.c:1593:client3_3_finodelk_cbk] > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: remote operation failed [Transport endpoint > is not connected] > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382835] E [rp...
2018 Apr 30
3
Finding performance bottlenecks
...0.42 2574.98 us 208.73 us 1710282.73 us 11877 FXATTROP 2.80 609.20 us 468.51 us 321422.91 us 333946 RCHECKSUM 5.04 548.76 us 14.83 us 76288179.46 us 668188 INODELK 18.46 149940.70 us 13.59 us 79966278.04 us 8949 FINODELK 20.04 395073.91 us 84.99 us 3835355.67 us 3688 FSYNC 53.17 131171.66 us 85.76 us 3838020.34 us 29470 WRITE 0.00 0.00 us 0.00 us 0.00 us 7238 UPCALL 0.00 0.00 us 0.00 us 0.00 us 7238 CI_IAT...
2017 Sep 05
3
Slow performance of gluster volume
Hi Krutika, I already have a preallocated disk on VM. Now I am checking performance with dd on the hypervisors which have the gluster volume configured. I tried also several values of shard-block-size and I keep getting the same low values on write performance. Enabling client-io-threads also did not have any affect. The version of gluster I am using is glusterfs 3.8.12 built on May 11 2017
2017 Sep 08
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
...(-- > /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7fbcad8d09fe] (--> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x90)[0x7fbcad8d2170] (--> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x2a0)[0x7fbcad8d2c20] ))))) 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) op(FINODELK(30)) called at 2017-09-08 09:31:45.626882 (xid=0x27ab5) [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382451] E [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:1593:client3_3_finodelk_cbk] 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: remote operation failed [Transport endpoint is not connected] [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382835] E [rpc-clnt.c:365:saved_frames...
2017 Sep 08
3
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Oh, you really don't want to go below 30s, I was told. I'm using 30 seconds for the timeout, and indeed when a node goes down the VM freez for 30 seconds, but I've never seen them go read only for that. I _only_ use virtio though, maybe it's that. What are you using ? On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 11:41:13AM +0200, Pavel Szalbot wrote: > Back to replica 3 w/o arbiter. Two fio jobs