search for: finer

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180 Summary: Add finer-grained controls to sshd Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org Rep...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180 ------- Comment #7 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2007-02-19 22:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=1240) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1240&action=view) Add support for auth types to Match This patch (against 4.5p1) allows a Match directive to control different authentication types. This patch was just committed

When plotting over multiple pages in lattice, I'd like to be able to have "same" scales within a page, but "free" scales between pages. In other words, something like: z<-data.frame(x=1:100, y=runif(100), d=rep(1:2,50), p=rep(1:2,each=50)) plot<-xyplot(y~x|d*p, data=z,

Greetings list- I'm on the hunt for a cron scheduler that supports definitions to the second. Obviously, every cron daemon supports minute/hour/etc but I have a special application that requires finer granularity. I know I know... someone will say "The load will be horrendous on your system" or "Why don't you simply schedule your cron every minute and make up the higher precision in your application?". Unfortunately, this will not work. I really need a cron daemon that c...

...eggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 06:50, Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of > > new gp1xx temperature sensor") added support for reading finer-grain > > temperatures, but continued to report temperatures in 1 degree Celsius > > increments via nvkm_therm_temp_get(). > > > > Rather than altering nvkm_therm_temp_get() to report finer-grain > > temperatures, which would be inconvenient for other users of the >...

Thanks for the info. My impression is that __sync_synchronize takes no arguments and is the memory barrier, i.e., "llvm.memory.barrier(i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true)". Is that right? I would like a little finer control to express just a write barrier (st-st) or a read barrier. -- Mon Ping On Sep 17, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Mon Ping Wang <wangmp at apple.com> > wrote: >> >> I would like access to LLVM memory barrier inst...

Hello all - This code will run, but it bogs down my computer when I run it for finer and finer time increments and more generations. I was wondering if there is a better way to write my loops so that this wouldn't happen. Thanks! -Tyler ################# # Bifurcation diagram # Using Braaksma system of equations # We have however used a Fourier analysis # to get a forci...

Hi, In following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=6X12D46sRFw They have specified that the inliner can't use DomTree/LoopInfo/MemorySSA analysis. 1. What's the reason for this? 2. Why can't we do it using getAnalysisUsage() construct? 3. Can inline use this information in the new Pass Manager? 4. What all information can we derive from DomTree to be of help to

...> Thanks for the info. My impression is that __sync_synchronize takes > no arguments and is the memory barrier, i.e., > "llvm.memory.barrier(i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true)". Is > that right? That's my understanding as well. > I would like a little finer control to express just a > write barrier (st-st) or a read barrier. My understanding is that the only types of finer grained control in gcc are the __sync_lock_test_and_set and __sync_lock_release which appear to implement acquire/release style barriers. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-...

...used interchangeably with `1` and `0`. > But what is the resolution of a factor? We must take a > somewhat pragmatic approach because base R often converts > character vectors to factors, and we don't want to be > burdensome to users. So we say that a factor `x` has finer > resolution than factor `y` if the levels of `y` are > contained in `x`. So to find the common type of two > factors, we take the union of the levels of each factor, > given a factor that has finer resolution than > both. Finally, you can think of a character vec...

...1] that seems to mirror much of RSpec, but built on Test::Unit, so in some ways less brittle from a Rails-integration perspective, and also allowing you to mix the two together as appropriate. So, has anyone made an informed comparison? I''m new enough that I don''t really know the finer points yet. The syntax is slightly different, but that seems like a minor issue Chris [1] http://rubyurl.com/6uT -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli at gmail.com

...sel-fuzzer or clang-fuzzer aren't really looking for security > bugs, so I wouldn't expect them to find stuff that falls under the > responsible disclosure umbrella. > So, how about making all LLVM bugs public by default and leaving cxa_demangler bugs private? (I can't make it finer-grained, see below) > > This should be thought about on a case by case basis, of course. > > > Should we automatically CC the bugs to any of the llvm maliing lists > (e.g. > > llvm-dev)? > > Perhaps we could CC them to llvm-bugs? That's the same list that new &gt...

Hi anyone know where i can find all internatinal numbering plan in csv and for free or small price ? thanks Jpc

Hello users, I have a Digium Te235 and asterisk 13 which have worked well with 1 carrier but we have failed to add a 2nd carrier. The second telco brings their E1 line over finer, terminated in a RAD modem and they give me ethernet to the E1 card. It's the first time i am having install such a solution, which ideally would be not a big problem. However, The physical layer has failed to come up! I have tried the same setup in an Alcatel OmniOCX and it works well. I can...

...> >> bugs, so I wouldn't expect them to find stuff that falls under the > >> responsible disclosure umbrella. > >> > > > > So, how about making all LLVM bugs public by default and leaving > > cxa_demangler bugs private? > > (I can't make it finer-grained, see below) > > This sounds good to me. > > >> > >> This should be thought about on a case by case basis, of course. > >> > >> > Should we automatically CC the bugs to any of the llvm maliing lists > >> (e.g. > >> > llvm-d...

...nfo. My impression is that __sync_synchronize takes >> no arguments and is the memory barrier, i.e., >> "llvm.memory.barrier(i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true)". Is >> that right? > > That's my understanding as well. > >> I would like a little finer control to express just a >> write barrier (st-st) or a read barrier. > > My understanding is that the only types of finer grained control in > gcc > are the __sync_lock_test_and_set and __sync_lock_release which > appear to > implement acquire/release style barriers. &g...

...ith different purposes. As I said in my previous email, the primary semantic purpose of factors is value restriction. You don't WANT to increase the set of levels when your set of values has already been carefully curated. Certainly not automagically. > So we say that a > factor `x` has finer resolution than factor `y` if the levels of `y` > are contained in `x`. So to find the common type of two factors, we > take the union of the levels of each factor, given a factor that has > finer resolution than both. I'm not so sure. I think a more useful definition of resolution m...

...move/resize option that will do what >> the OP wants. > > > The problem with gparted is that it works only in units of megabytes. > There is no way to move a partition to a particular sector or, for > that matter, do much of anything _exactly_. I'm not sure why granularity finer than 1MiB is necessary. But setting that aside, with a rotational drive with 4KiB sectors, you're better off with 1MiB alignment than not being 4KiB aligned at all. Depending on the drive and workload misalignment can cause a brutally bad performance hit. And if it doesn't then I wouldn'...

I've been playing with a quincunx animation in R 1.2.2 and would like to have finer control over the speed of the animation. I know that I can use system("sleep 1") on unix systems at least, but it would be nice to have something like pause(.01). Any suggestions? url: http://www.econ.uiuc.edu Roger Koenker email roger at ysidro.econ.uiuc.edu Department of Econom...

...ng. > > With Btrfs you could use the Snapper VFS module to expose the read-only > snapshots to clients via the Windows Previous Versions UI. Or, for oldsters like myself, rsnapshot reading from the current filesystem. It's often much, much simpler to implement and lends itself fell to finer tuning and restoration of old content than a filesystem based backup.