search for: findregressions

...binaries. When this step is finished, you'll get a directory containing a log file (report.json) Now for the important: you have to do this for 3.2final *and* 3.3rc1m so simply repeat steps 1 to 3. Once you have the result.json files for both releases, you can compare them with the mentioned findRegressions-{nightly,simple}.py scripts. I hope that clarifies some things. Cheers, Sebastian -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Sebastian Dreßler Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB) Takustraße 7 D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem Germany dressler at zib.de Phone: +49 30 84185-261 http://www.zib.de/

First, let me ask if there's a page that documents the testing process in full. If there is, just give me a link to that and save yourself the time of answering this. (I did Google it, all I found was docs on writing tests for LLVM.) Sorry if this is way off, but I have no idea what to download and unpack to start testing. I know it's stuff from here:

...-test-asserts as well The script will run basic tests and this is something to check for failures, it will also compare outputs of Phase2 and Phase3 and report differences (we've been seeing these in previous releases) The next thing would be to run the test-suite for both releases and use the findRegressions.py (also in utils/release) to compare the output of 3.2 final and the freshly built 3.3 To run the test-suite you run something like this inside llvm/projects/llvm-test directory make -k LLVMCC_OPTION=clang ENABLE_BUILT_CLANG=1 ENABLE_PARALLEL_REPORT=1 TEST=simple report > ../../../simple-report...

Hi all, I tend to compare the test suite result of LLVM 3.0 and LLVM 3.1 RC1. I was told that the input file of findRegressions-nightly.py is report.nightly.raw.out. I run LLVM 3.0 test suite with lnt, but I see no report.nightly.raw.out under the SANDBOX directory but only the test.log. Anyone knows what option I should give to lnt so that it can generate report.nightly.raw.out? Or I have to run LLVM 3.0 test suite manuall...

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!! > > What's Expected > --------------- > > You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for > the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in being one." Well, ask >

Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!! What's Expected --------------- You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in being one." Well, ask yourself no more! Not only do I have the answers for you, but talking to yourself will cause people to avoid you. Here's