Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "findity".
2018 Mar 14
2
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...erformance
>
>
>
> Ondrej
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:10 AM
>
> *To:* Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
> *Cc:* Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>;
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
> Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it might be close to the...
2018 Mar 13
1
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...erformance
>
>
>
> Ondrej
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:10 AM
>
> *To:* Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
> *Cc:* Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>;
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
> Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it might be close to the...
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...with a single server (+DRBD optionally for HA), it will give you the best performance
Ondrej
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:10 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>; Gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com<mailto:Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>> wrote:
Well, it might be close to the _synchronous_ nfs,...
2018 Mar 13
3
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...twork.inode-lru-limit=50000
>
>
> Ondrej
>
>
>
> *From:* Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 8:28 AM
> *To:* Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
> *Cc:* Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>;
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
> Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Gluster will nev...
2018 Mar 12
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Hi,
Can you send us the following details:
1. gluster volume info
2. What client you are using to run this?
Thanks,
Nithya
On 12 March 2018 at 18:16, Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>
wrote:
> Heya fellas.
>
> I've been struggling quite a lot to get glusterfs to perform even
> halfdecently with a write-intensive workload. Testnumbers are from gluster
> 3.10.7.
>
> We store a bunch of small files in a doubly-tiered sha1 hash fanout
> directory...
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...conds to execute on the NFS share, but 90 seconds on GlusterFS ? i.e. 10 times slower.
Ondrej
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 8:28 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>; Gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com<mailto:Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Gluster will never perform well for small file...
2018 Mar 12
4
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Heya fellas.
I've been struggling quite a lot to get glusterfs to perform even
halfdecently with a write-intensive workload. Testnumbers are from gluster
3.10.7.
We store a bunch of small files in a doubly-tiered sha1 hash fanout
directory structure. The directories themselves aren't overly full. Most of
the data we write to gluster is "write once, read probably never", so 99%
2018 Mar 13
5
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>
> I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
>
It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to
NFS now.
Andreas,
Looking at your workload, I am suspecting there to be lot of LOOKUPs
2018 Mar 14
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
That seems unlikely. I pre-create the directory layout and then write to
directories I know exist.
I don't quite understand how any settings at all can reduce performance to
1/5000 of what I get when writing straight to ramdisk though, and
especially when running on a single node instead of in a cluster. Has
anyone else set this up and managed to get better write performance?
On 13 March