search for: final_size

Introduce i_blockmask() to simplify code, which replace (i_blocksize(node) - 1). Like done in commit 93407472a21b("fs: add i_blocksize()"). Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com> --- v4: -drop ext4 patch -erofs patch based on mainline -a bit change in ocfs2 patch include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h

Introduce i_blockmask() to simplify code, which replace (i_blocksize(node) - 1). Like done in commit 93407472a21b("fs: add i_blocksize()"). Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com> --- v3: -none v2: -convert to i_blockmask() include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index c85916e9f7db..17387d465b8b

...loff_t pos, > return ret; > } > > -static int ocfs2_is_io_unaligned(struct inode *inode, size_t count, loff_t pos) > +static bool ocfs2_is_io_unaligned(struct inode *inode, size_t count, loff_t pos) > { > - int blockmask = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - 1; > - loff_t final_size = pos + count; > - > - if ((pos & blockmask) || (final_size & blockmask)) > - return 1; > - return 0; > + return ((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode)) != 0; Or !!((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode))? My concern is just like erofs, we'd better get vfs helper into...

The message from this sender included one or more files which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduce i_blockmask() to simplify code, which replace (i_blocksize(node) - 1). Like done in commit 93407472a21b("fs: add i_blocksize()").

...y. (gdb) bt full #0? a_crash () at ./arch/x86_64/atomic_arch.h:108 No locals. #1? free (p=0x55d949250660) at src/malloc/malloc.c:467 ??????? extra = 65 ??????? base = 0x55d94925060f "" ??????? len = 94391723427649 ??????? self = 0x55d949250650 ??????? next = <optimized out> ??????? final_size = <optimized out> ??????? new_size = <optimized out> ??????? size = <optimized out> ??????? reclaim = 0 ??????? i = <optimized out> #2? 0x00007fbd98ae7e29 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libclucene-core.so.1 No symbol table info available. #3? 0x00007fbd98ae87ee in ?? () from /usr/li...

Dear list, We been having some issues where the indexer-worker is crashing. This happens on production servers which are handling a slight amount of mail, but is also reproducible by moving messages. Also, users on my server are complaining about "Trashed" items coming back etc. Some details: - Dovecot 2.3.2.1 in alpine:3.8 based Docker container. As part of the Mailu distribution.