search for: filterrul

...ba at haravikk.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org Okay, so currently when forming an import rule to add filters to a sync, rsync only supports either a path local to the source directory, or a system level absolute path. For example, say I have filter rules located at: /Users/haravikk/FilterRules/Common.rules /Users/haravikk/FilterRules/Mac.rules If I wanted Mac.rules to include the contents of Common.rules I would need to add a rule like so: . /Users/haravikk/FilterRules/Common.rules This is because a local rule won't work, i.e: . Common.rules What I would like to propose is a new...

...<dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good solution for many usecases. Same setup we use many years. > We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this setup. creating mailboxes, managing mailboxes, creating automated filterrules, backupsystem to tell something of them. we can not switch our whole mailsetup to work around this bug. > How to get a dump if dovecot not crashing but has wrong behaviour? I would like to help and provide useful info, but it depends on kind of problem. > I think if a classic setup is not w...

Hello, is there a way to refilter all mails in a folder without loosing all flags and moving all messages in a different folder? I have >10k mails in my Inbox and need to create new filterrules from time to time. But there is no way to refilter my inbox without moving. Atm i need to move all mails in a folder like "refilter" and then run getmail/... to refilter the mails. It would be really nice to refilter a existing folder and just move mails with hits in the filter list....

On 08-09-16 20:51, @lbutlr wrote: > On Tue Sep 06 2016 07:25:38 Hajo Locke <hajo.locke at gmx.de> said >> How to solve this case and find a string in arbitrary/unknown headerline? > > You?ll have to create multiple sieves covering the possible headers. > Maybe when you tell what you're trying to achieve, we can give you better advice. Almost no one is looking for

...problems with ADSL-connections) with IPtables? It wasn''t possible with IPchains, so u32 had to be used. Now there is this nice little --tcp-flags option. But I just don''t know if this is all I need. The u32 was checking for packetsize too. So if there is a eqivalent to the u32 ACK-filterrule, what would it look like? What I have found in the ML is this: ---- # Set ACK as prioritized traffic (ACK''s are less than 100 bytes) $IPTABLES -t mangle -A MANGLE_MARK -p tcp -m length --length :100 -j MARK --set-mark 1 $IPTABLES -t mangle -A MANGLE_MARK -p tcp -m length --length :100 -j...

I try to shape traffic using HTB and mark packets within iptables using PREROUTING. But the filterrules seems to ignore the marks set with PREROUTING Only POSTROUTING marks are accepted. First my configuration I have a router connected to the internet via ADSL over interface ppp0. eth0 is a tunnel to ppp0 and eth1 serves the LAN. LAN is 192.168.57.0/24 on 10Mbit ppp0 is 80.126.16.44 on 320Kbit...

...e instead of procmail. > > Aki > > I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good solution for many usecases. Same setup we use many years. We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this setup. creating mailboxes, managing mailboxes, creating automated filterrules, backupsystem to tell something of them. we can not switch our whole mailsetup to work around this bug. How to get a dump if dovecot not crashing but has wrong behaviour? I would like to help and provide useful info, but it depends on kind of problem. I think if a classic setup is not working...

...>> I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good >> solution for many usecases. Same setup we use many years. >> We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this setup. >> creating mailboxes, managing mailboxes, creating automated >> filterrules, backupsystem to tell something of them. we can not switch >> our whole mailsetup to work around this bug. >> How to get a dump if dovecot not crashing but has wrong behaviour? I >> would like to help and provide useful info, but it depends on kind of >> problem. >&g...

On 21.2.2019 10.53, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > Am 20.02.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: >>> On 18 February 2019 09:28 Hajo Locke via dovecot >>> <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> ? ? it seems we need a dovecot developers opinion. May be we hit a >>> bug or cant help

http://dovecot.org/test/ Just mbox fixes since 1.0-test16. The logic is simpler and more correct now. Can anyone break it anymore? I actually tested it a while with Evolution and several mailboxes and it didn't break at least immediately. :) Now maybe a few more days and I dare trying this thing myself with my real mboxes (yes, I'm still using them). Dovecot mailing list archives could