Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "filterdagbasicblocknam".
Did you mean:
filterdagbasicblockname
2015 Aug 01
3
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
...7ee06fc153b2 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {
(void)BlockNumber;
bool MatchFilterBB = false; (void)MatchFilterBB;
#ifndef NDEBUG
- MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() &&
+ MatchFilterBB = (FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() ||
FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
#endif
—
Mehdi
> On Aug 1, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com&...
2015 Aug 11
2
Fwd: [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
...7ee06fc153b2 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {
(void)BlockNumber;
bool MatchFilterBB = false; (void)MatchFilterBB;
#ifndef NDEBUG
- MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() &&
+ MatchFilterBB = (FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() ||
FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
#endif
—
Mehdi
On Aug 1, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com<mai...
2015 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, this:
MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() &&
FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
Should be:
MatchFilterBB = (FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() ||
FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
FuncInfo->MBB-...
2015 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
...ers <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>
wrote:
> I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't
> merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in
> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, this:
>
> MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() &&
>
> FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
>
> FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
>
> Should be:
>
> MatchFilterBB = (FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() ||
>
> FilterDAGBasicBlo...
2015 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
Daniel,
We are using 3.6. Someone also pointed out that it was mandatory in 3.6.2
but I have not verified that.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>
wrote:
> It's not supposed to be. There was a short period where it was
> unintentionally mandatory but this was fixed after I pointed it out during
> post-commit review.
>
>