search for: filter_ratio

...this is just because there are some odd values in st->interp_qlpc. However it seems like it can also just happen sometimes as output of the _mm_mul_ps multiply goes to INF (this can also happen in the non-sse code). I am working on figuring out why this is happening. With the new changes also filter_ratio went to 0 in one of my tests, in part because rh was INF. This is around the section where I think you made changes to how you calculate st->pi_gain[sub]. This caused scale to go to INF further down in the code when scale is calculated. Again, this I think stems from the lpc function producing...

...qlpc. > However it seems like it can also just happen sometimes as > output of the _mm_mul_ps multiply goes to INF (this can also > happen in the non-sse code). I am working on figuring out why > this is happening. Can you leave SSE out of that for now? > With the new changes also filter_ratio went to 0 in one of my > tests, in part because rh was INF. This is around the section > where I think you made changes to how you calculate st->pi_gain[sub]. > This caused scale to go to INF further down in the code when > scale is calculated. Again, this I think stems from the lp...

A little more info on this: I backtracked deeper into this and it looks like excBuf is corrupted, which is corrupted by low_innov_alias being invalid. However it is not entirely clear where that gets initialized (in sb_celp it is set to out+st->frame_size) Tom