search for: fillip

...ing that recompileAndRelinkFunction() and freeMachineCodeForFunction() are both vestiges of the old JIT (i.e. the "JIT" as opposed to the "MCJIT").  The old JIT is no longer actively supported. -Phil On April 26, 2014 at 9:47:05 AM, Sri (emdcdeveloper at gmail.com) wrote: Hi Fillip                  Addition to my previous mail, llvm has recompileAndRelinkFunction function , so, once we modified the llvm function, and  pass IR to recompileAndRelinkFunction , I hope it should be compiled and linked with previous one. Thanks Regards Sri. On 04/26/2014 12:15 PM, Sri wrote: Hi F...

Hi Filip Thank you for your detailed explanation, I was actually looking to implement an adaptive approach which is basically when some function executed more frequently, I was trying to drop that function and compiled and linked with new optimized function. I just did the following - whenever some function executed more times , I called-back to program, so I that I

Please, could someone help me figure out what seems to be a very simple problem (and is still taking me hours...). I want to draw a simple scatterplot but with 'equal' axes, i.e. I want both axes to go from -3 to 3. Values for x lie between -2 and 0.5, values for y between -2.2 and 3. I have tried 'usr' and 'eqscplot' and a few other options, but it doesn't give me the

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8