Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "filevel".
Did you mean:
uilevel
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
...ot; 10
+Do exhaustive search of LP coefficient
+quantization (expensive!). Overrides -q,
+does nothing if using -l 0
+.IP "\fB-q\fP \fIbits\fP" 10
+Precision of the quantized linear-predictor
+coefficients, 0 => let encoder decide (min is 5,
+default is 0)
+.IP "\fB-r\fP \fIlevel\fP" 10
+Rice parameter optimization level (0..99). 0
+=> none, default is 0, above 4 doesn't usually
+help much)
+.IP "\fB-V\fP" 10
+Verify a correct encoding by decoding the
+output in parallel and comparing to the
+original
+.IP "\fB-m-\fP \fB-M-\fP \fB-e-\fP \f...
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the
> > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as
> > beta 10.
>
> What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable
> distribution?
>